• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies

July 5, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

—Reviewed by Sue Pondrom

You Might Also Like

  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
Explore This Issue
July 2012

Nasal Steroids Effective in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Polyposis

Do topical nasal steroids improve patient symptomatology in chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis?

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyposis affects 0.5 percent to 4 percent of the world population and is present in approximately 20 percent of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. A large number of randomized controlled trials have evaluated the efficacy of topical nasal steroids to improve symptomology. While prior studies have used a change in polyp size as a surrogate for a direct clinical benefit, there has been no demonstration of a correlation between endoscopic grading and patient symptom scores.

Study design: Systematic review with meta-analysis using standardized methodology.

Setting: Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Sinus Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.

Synopsis: A total of 19 randomized controlled trials met inclusion and exclusion criteria for a systematic review. The trials were performed from 1993 to 2010, ranging in length from four to 270 weeks. All evaluated three steroid formulations: fluticasone, mometasone and budesonide.

The authors found that gender, age and history of prior polypectomy did not appear to influence steroid efficacy. They did, however, find publication bias in the studies. Topical nasal steroid therapy (all three in the studies) in patients with CRS and nasal polyposis were found to be efficacious. Noting that polyp size reduction is only an indirect measure of clinical success, the authors said one can argue that the most clinically relevant outcome is patient-reported symptoms.

Bottom line: Topical nasal steroids improve patient symptomatology in chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis.

Reference: Rudmik L, Schlosser RJ, Smith TL, Soler ZM. Impact of topical nasal steroid therapy on symptoms of nasal polyposis: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 122(7):1431-1437.

—Reviewed by Sue Pondrom

Study Looks at Costs of Laryngeal Diseases and Disorders

What are the annual direct costs associated with the evaluation and management of patients with laryngeal disorders, and what is the proportion of annual direct costs related to physician encounters, procedure claims and pharmacy claims?

Background: Approximately one-third of adults experience dysphonia at some point during their lifetime. Dysphonia impacts quality of life and work productivity. Prior studies have focused primarily on specific disease states and populations. One study, by Verdolini and Ramig, estimated costs but only for a teaching population, and it was not clear how cost estimates for voice therapy and surgery were determined.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Departments, Literature Reviews, Online Exclusives Tagged With: adenotonsillectomy, Facebook, HNSCC, OSA, steroidsIssue: July 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939