• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Limited Histopathology Adequate for Evaluating Routine Cholesteatoma Cases

by Amy Eckner • February 4, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Are routine histopathologic diagnoses of cholesteatoma specimens necessary and cost effective?

Background: Treating chronic otitis media with or without cholesteatoma through tympanomastoidectomy is common, generating surgical specimens that must be examined to decide whether or not they should undergo pathologic evaluation. These study authors sought to explore the clinical utility and cost effectiveness of routine cholesteatoma histopathologic evaluation in the same way that routine tonsillectomy histopathologic evaluation has been questioned.

You Might Also Like

  • Tonsillectomy Specimen Analysis Not Cost Effective
  • Intraoperative Endoscope Use Reduces Cholesteatoma Recurrence, Cost
  • Mastoid Obliteration Could Be Effective in Cholesteatoma Surgery, but More Data Are Needed
  • No Evidence for Mucosal Migration Theory of Cholesteatoma Formation

Study design: Retrospective chart analysis of patients undergoing tympanomastoidectomy for chronic otitis media, with specimens submitted for pathologic review between January 1, 2010 and October 26, 2011. The 2012 Medicare reimbursement rate of $61.95 was used for cost analysis.

Setting: Providence Hospital and Medical Center, Southfield, Mich.

Synopsis: The study included 178 consecutive cases of tympanomastoidectomy for chronic otitis media with surgical specimens submitted for histopathologic review. Each histopathologic diagnosis was compared with the surgeon’s intraoperative gross findings in the operative report. Of the 178 cases, 162 of the surgeon’s operative and pathology reports agreed that cholesteatoma was present. In 14 cases, the surgeon’s operative and pathology reports agreed that pathology other than cholesteatoma, such as granulation tissue or a glomus tumor, was present. In two cases, the surgeon suspected cholesteatoma, but the pathologist disagreed, stating that submitted tissue was mucosa or inflammatory tissue. No malignancies were found, and there were no instances of the pathology report disagreeing with the surgeon’s report stating cholesteatoma was present. The total annual cost for cholesteatoma histopathologic review would be $1,115,100.

Bottom line: There is evidence to limit or avoid routine histopathologic evaluation of cholesteatoma and instead selectively utilize histopathology in cases where pathology other than cholesteatoma is suspected.

Citation: Kircher ML, Thottam PJ, Bojrab DI, Babu SC. Utility and cost analysis of cholesteatoma histopathologic evaluation. Laryngoscope. 2014:124:538-540.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus

You Might Also Like:

  • Tonsillectomy Specimen Analysis Not Cost Effective
  • Intraoperative Endoscope Use Reduces Cholesteatoma Recurrence, Cost
  • Mastoid Obliteration Could Be Effective in Cholesteatoma Surgery, but More Data Are Needed
  • No Evidence for Mucosal Migration Theory of Cholesteatoma Formation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Physician Handwriting: A Potentially Powerful Healing Tool
    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939