• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Medicaid Expansion Associated with Improved Survival of Head and Neck Cancer

by Linda Kossoff • December 5, 2024

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Clinical Question

How does stage at presentation and survival compare when looking at cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in Medicaid-expanded states versus non-expanded states?

You Might Also Like

  • Survival for Advanced Head, Neck Cancer Improvements May Be Related to PET
  • High-Volume Hospitals, Surgeons Better Predictors of Overall Survival in Head, Neck Cancer
  • Discovery of the Unknown Primary Tumor Is Associated with Improved Disease-Specific Survival
  • Regular NSAID Use May Improve Survival in Some with Head and Neck Cancer
Explore This Issue
December 2024

Bottom Line

Medicaid expansion is associated with fewer stage IV cases and with improved survival in cases of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Studies demonstrate the associations of insurance type and status on head and neck cancer treatment access and outcomes; however, no study has assessed the impact of Medicaid expansion, which widens eligibility to include adults under 65 years of age with incomes up to 138% of the federal poverty level, on head and neck cancer survival outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study

SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago

SYNOPSIS: Researchers mined the head and neck with human papillomavirus status database within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program to isolate a de-identified data set of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cases diagnosed from 2010 to 2016. Data was extracted on patient age, sex, and race. The team included only patients who have Medicaid or no insurance. Expanded (EXP) states were those accepting and implementing Medicaid expansion in 2016 or earlier; nonexpanded (NEXP) states implemented expansion after 2016 or not at all. The case selection process resulted in 2,215 patients (1,778 males; 2,152 “older adults,” or those between ages 40 and 64) meeting inclusion criteria. Compared to NEXP states, EXP states had a significantly larger proportion of Medicaid patients (20.3% versus 16.7%). Multivariable analysis showed that cases under Medicaid expansion were 31% less likely to present with stage IV disease compared to cases in NEXP states. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed that cases under Medicare expansion were 32% less likely to die compared to cases in NEXP states. Authors note that the study does not compare pre-expansion cases with post-expansion cases. Study limitations include its retrospective nature.

CITATION: Arch RS, Fei-Zhang DJ, Patel U, et al. Influence of Medicaid expansion on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma presentation and survival. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024;170:431-437.

DISCUSSION: “This thoughtful retrospective cohort study by Arch and colleagues analyzed SEER data for head and neck cancer patients in states with expanded Medicaid versus states with nonexpanded Medicaid. The authors found that patients in Medicaid expansion states were 31% less likely to present with stage IV disease and had 32% lower mortality risk compared to patients in nonexpanded Medicaid states. Improved healthcare access in general and Medicaid expansion in particular remain important factors to address healthcare disparities for vulnerable head and neck cancer patients.” Dr. Nathan Grohmann

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Head and Neck, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Tagged With: head and neck cancer, MedicaidIssue: December 2024

You Might Also Like:

  • Survival for Advanced Head, Neck Cancer Improvements May Be Related to PET
  • High-Volume Hospitals, Surgeons Better Predictors of Overall Survival in Head, Neck Cancer
  • Discovery of the Unknown Primary Tumor Is Associated with Improved Disease-Specific Survival
  • Regular NSAID Use May Improve Survival in Some with Head and Neck Cancer

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939