• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Medicare Approves New Measure Groups in PQRS for Otolaryngology

by Richard Quinn • February 10, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In 2007, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) established the Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI), which later morphed into the now ubiquitously referenced Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). Starting Jan. 1 this year, physicians who did not participate in the pay-for-reporting system stood to lose 1.5% of allowable Medicare charges.

You Might Also Like

  • Time to Comply with Physician Quality Reporting System Is Now
  • Medicare Reform Legislation Repeals SGR, Consolidates Incentive Programs
  • Physician Groups Set 2011 Agenda: Medicare payment reform tops the list
  • Not So Fast: New quality provisions aren’t ready for implementation, medical groups say
Explore This Issue
February 2015

For otolaryngology, the issue was even more dire than a practice losing a portion of its already strained revenue stream. The CMS system afforded the specialty no measures groups, the billing term for an aggregated list of individual measures that relate to the field. Instead, otolaryngologists could only choose to file for individual measures, whose reporting guidelines are more involved, time-consuming, and costly than measures groups.

But that grim situation is no more.

A measures group may particularly benefit the private practice otolaryngologist.

A measures group may particularly benefit the private practice otolaryngologist.

The American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO-HNSF) and the American Board of Otolaryngology (ABOto) came together early last year to create two new measures groups for otolaryngologists that were ultimately approved for use by CMS. The groups will cover acute otitis externa (AOE) and adult sinusitis.

“We’re a very heterogeneous specialty,” said Randal Weber, MD, chair of head and neck surgery at The University of Texas at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston and the ABOto president-elect. “Some of us see primarily head and neck cancer, while others see patients with ear problems. Some are in academic practice, and others are in solo or multi-specialty private practice arrangements. “So having a measure group may particularly benefit the private practice otolaryngologist, because it covers a spectrum of patients that they would normally see in their practice and opens up [PQRS participation] to a lot of practitioners in otolaryngology,” he added.

AAO-HNSF and other specialty associations began discussing proposed measures groups early in 2014, with the goal of presenting them to CMS for approval. Last summer, negotiations continued, and by the November release of the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule, CMS approved the measures groups for inclusion in PQRS in 2015.

“It’s difficult to measure quality improvement without measures,” said James C. Denneny III, MD, the new executive vice president and chief executive officer of the AAO-HNS and its foundation. “Putting together parameters is very difficult, because it involves reviewing literature, hundreds of articles, by panels that are versed in doing this, and then selecting what has the evidence to support proven ways to do this, and a lot of that evidence does come from these types of clinical studies. So [this is] a transition step to where we’re going now, where we’ll have precise parameters that are measurable across the country to guide consistency in treatment for patients across the board.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: Medicare, PQRS, QualityIssue: February 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • Time to Comply with Physician Quality Reporting System Is Now
  • Medicare Reform Legislation Repeals SGR, Consolidates Incentive Programs
  • Physician Groups Set 2011 Agenda: Medicare payment reform tops the list
  • Not So Fast: New quality provisions aren’t ready for implementation, medical groups say

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Has your practice or department been affected by the lack of anesthesiologists?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Bottleneck In the OR: How Anesthesiologist Shortages Threaten Surgical Care
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Laryngeal Mask Airway Use in Tonsillectomy
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
    • Bottleneck In the OR: How Anesthesiologist Shortages Threaten Surgical Care
    • Onboarding and Working with APPs
    • Evaluating Treatment Patterns in Bell’s Palsy Using Nationwide Employer- Sponsored Healthcare Claims
    • Randomized Trials Comparing Inferior Turbinoplasty Techniques for Nasal Obstruction

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939