• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Medicare Reform Legislation Repeals SGR, Consolidates Incentive Programs

by Karen Appold • June 8, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What happened on Thursday, April 16, was nearly two decades in the making. After 18 years and 17 short-term patches, President Obama signed a $214 billion Medicare reform package (HR 2) that addresses issues that have long plagued physicians and their patients. Dubbed the “doc fix,” the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) permanently ends yearly threats to cut Medicare payments to physicians, a practice that stems back to a 1997 law.

You Might Also Like

  • Price Cut Generates Momentum Behind Push to Revamp SGR
  • Payment Limbo: Medical societies take on SGR reform
  • Physician Groups Set 2011 Agenda: Medicare payment reform tops the list
  • Medicare Meltdown: Congress Seeks Payment Formula Fix
Explore This Issue
June 2015

“We are very excited about it,” said James C. Denneny III, MD, executive vice president and CEO of the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS), who has been lobbying, along with other members of the organization, to get the bill passed for 14 years. “It is very gratifying to have it finally come to fruition,” he added.

But Dr. Denneny was quick to note another aspect of the victory—its strong bipartisan support. The U.S. Senate passed the bill by a vote of 92-8, and the House approved it by a 392-37 vote. “The scope of this bill underscores what can be accomplished when lawmakers work in a bipartisan manner,” Dr. Denneny said. “To see the system work was very important to me.”

Jeffrey Kahn, MD, an otolaryngologist at the Texas-based Austin Ear Nose and Throat Clinic who serves on the Texas Medical Association’s Council on Health Care Quality, acknowledged the amount of effort that went into the bill’s passage. “It’s great that it passed, but it seems a bit like a hollow victory because so much work and resources went into fixing something that should have been fixed long ago and that clearly had broad bipartisan support.”

The Nuts and Bolts

The Medicare physician payment provisions are expected to help build a more sustainable, fair, and efficient Medicare physician payment system that results in high quality, affordable healthcare. The bill, negotiated by House Speaker John Boehner and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, calls for spending $214 billion over 10 years, with $73 billion offset by spending cuts or new revenue.

The new law includes provisions that address several legislative priorities set forth by the AAO-HNS. Among these are the permanent repeal of the flawed sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula used to determine payments to physicians under the Medicare program. “This represents a great improvement in Medicare payment for patients and physicians,” said Gregory W. Randolph, MD, director of the general otolaryngology and thyroid surgical divisions at Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Harvard Medical School, Boston. “As a result of this, a 21.2% physician pay cut was avoided.”

Jeffrey Kahn, MDWe’d better get the value-based issue right; if we don’t, it could adversely change the whole landscape of medicine and our relationship with our patients.
—Jeffrey Kahn, MD

The flawed payment formula has caused ongoing uncertainty with regard to whether or not physicians could profitably take on Medicare patients. “Several colleagues were concerned that their salary may be cut when it seemed like the cuts would actually go through,” Dr. Randolph said. “For private practitioners, it must have been even more stressful, as it would directly and immediately cut their take-home pay and affect their practice’s cash flow.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: Medicare, physician payment, policy, SGRIssue: June 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • Price Cut Generates Momentum Behind Push to Revamp SGR
  • Payment Limbo: Medical societies take on SGR reform
  • Physician Groups Set 2011 Agenda: Medicare payment reform tops the list
  • Medicare Meltdown: Congress Seeks Payment Formula Fix

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939