• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Neurofibromatosis Patients See Different Benefits from CI and ABI Technology

by ENTtoday • September 16, 2018

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What factors influence implant success in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) who have undergone both cochlear implantation and auditory brainstem implantation (ABI) for hearing rehabilitation?

Bottom line
If the cochlear nerve is intact, cochlear implantation can be effective for hearing rehabilitation in NF2 patients; however, a significant proportion experience a decline in CI performance. ABI remains the standard option for surgical hearing rehabilitation in NF2, but peak performance is generally lower than that achievable with CIs.

You Might Also Like

  • Benefits of Cochlear Implants in Single-Sided Deafness Patients
  • Bilateral CI in Children Shows Few Benefits Over Unilateral Implantation
  • Patients Report Long-Term Benefits with Bone-Anchored Hearing Device
  • Is Cochlear Implantation Effective for Auditory Rehabilitation Following Vestibular Schwannoma Treatment?
Explore This Issue
September 2018

Background: NF2 is an autosomal dominant hereditary disorder characterized by bilateral vestibular schwannomas in 90% to 95% of affected patients. Minimizing morbidity and maximizing the duration of useful hearing can be at odds. Unaidable hearing can be rehabilitated through an ABI, cochlear implant (CI), or both. However, device performance is highly variable and affected by patient and surgical factors.

Study design: Retrospective case series of 10 NF2 patients with both cochlear implantations and auditory brainstem implantations.

Setting: House Clinic, Los Angeles, Calif.

Synopsis: Iowa tests of vowel and consonant recognition, the Northwestern University Children’s Perception of Speech (NU-CHIPS), and City University of New York (CUNY) sentences were performed. Of the 10 patients, there were four right-sided and six left-sided CIs; only one CI was single-channel. Average age at cochlear implantation was 36.8 years. In the recipient ear, average deafness duration was 4.3 years. CI mean scores were NU-CHIPS 61%, Iowa consonants 37%, and Iowa vowels 45%. Mean scores with CIs for CUNY sentences were sound-only mode 42%, lipreading 44%, and sound+lip-reading 78%. Four patients experienced a CI performance reduction to unusable levels over 11 years. Seven patients had right-sided and three patients had left-sided ABIs. Mean age at ABI placement was 39.6 years, and mean deafness duration was 4.3 years. Average follow-up for testing after ABI placement was 6.6 years. ABI mean scores were NU-CHIPS 56%, Iowa consonants 21%, and Iowa vowels 25%. Mean scores with ABIs for CUNY sentences were sound-only mode 5%, lip-reading 45%, and sound+lip-reading 65%. Limitations included a small study population and significant heterogeneity; potentially confounding technology differences; and patient follow-up inconsistency.

Citation: Peng KA, Lorenz MB, Otto SR, Brackmann DE, Wilkinson EP. Cochlear implantation and auditory brainstem implantation in neurofibromatosis type 2. Laryngoscope. March 24, 2018. doi: 10.1002/lary.27181.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: auditory brainstem implantation, cochlear implantation, hearing loss, neurofibromatosisIssue: September 2018

You Might Also Like:

  • Benefits of Cochlear Implants in Single-Sided Deafness Patients
  • Bilateral CI in Children Shows Few Benefits Over Unilateral Implantation
  • Patients Report Long-Term Benefits with Bone-Anchored Hearing Device
  • Is Cochlear Implantation Effective for Auditory Rehabilitation Following Vestibular Schwannoma Treatment?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939