• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction

by Karen Appold • January 12, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Eustachian Tube Scores Effective Diagnostic Tools for Chronic Obstructive Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
  • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
  • Intranasal Corticosteroids Treatment Shown Ineffective for Chronic Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
  • New Consensus Statement on Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube
Explore This Issue
January 2016

Treating the Pediatric Population

The most common and only proven method to treat Eustachian tube dysfunction manifestations, in both adults and children, is ventilation tube placement. “Although this doesn’t change Eustachian tube function, it eliminates the symptoms and results of Eustachian tube dysfunction, such as negative pressure, pain, popping, fluid buildup and ear infections,” said Cuneyt M. Alper, MD, professor of otolaryngology at Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh—University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Dr. Alper sees both adults and children in the Eustachian tube dysfunction specialty clinic, where patients are evaluated using methods that include testing inside a pressure chamber. Both types of patients may also be enrolled in research protocols on Eustachian tube dysfunction funded by the National Institutes of Health.

If the condition recurs after extrusion of tubes in children, Dr. Alper will reinsert the tubes and consider removing the adenoids and evaluating and treating common risk factors of Eustachian tube dysfunction, including nasal allergies, sinus infections, and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Although there aren’t any recent developments in treating pediatric patients, Dr. Alper said, “Incomplete removal or regrowth of adenoids may impinge the Eustachian tube opening.” In these instances, he removes the tissue in addition to medical management—resulting in improved function.

At this time, there are no controlled studies to support the efficacy of any alternative treatments for Eustachian tube dysfunction, including balloon dilation, reported Dr. Alper, who is in the process of conducting research on this method in adults. “Efficacy and safety of new treatment methods ethically requires testing in adults first,” he said.—KA

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus, Special Report Tagged With: clinical, eustachian tube dysfunction, Otology, treatmentIssue: January 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Eustachian Tube Scores Effective Diagnostic Tools for Chronic Obstructive Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
  • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
  • Intranasal Corticosteroids Treatment Shown Ineffective for Chronic Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
  • New Consensus Statement on Balloon Dilation of the Eustachian Tube

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • History of the Cochlear Implant

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • ENTtoday Recognized for Excellence
    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939