• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Older Antiepileptic Drugs May Prevent Noise-Induced Hearing Loss

by Paula Moyer • August 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Noise-induced hearing loss is a key challenge in otolaryngology today. Interestingly, an older class of antiepileptic drugs, T-type calcium blockers, may hold promise as preventive agents.

You Might Also Like

  • MP3 Generation: Noise-induced hearing loss rising among children and adolescents
  • Tests Lead to Recommendations for Preventing Music-Induced Hearing Loss
  • Falling on Deaf Ears: Hearing loss in older adults may be an undertreated condition
  • Ability to Heal from Hearing Damage Linked to Ear’s Circadian Rhythms
Explore This Issue
August 2007

In a recently published study, a transnational team of Chinese and US investigators found that mice that were given trimethadione (Tridione) or ethosuximide (Zarontin) and then exposed to loud noises had lower levels of permanent noise-induced hearing loss than did controls.1 The rationale for using these agents was that since calcium dysregulation is known to contribute to noise-induced hearing loss, calcium channel blockers may have preventive value.

In the study, the investigators divided the mice into three groups: a prevention group, which received the medications in drinking water prior to noise exposure; a treatment group, which received the medications after noise exposure; and controls, which received neither medication. The medications were delivered separately in the preventive and treatment groups.

Prevention and Treatment Benefits Documented

The investigators found that trimethadione had significant value as a preventive agent, as measured by auditory brainstem recording. Both agents reduced noise-induced hearing loss as treatments given after noise exposure. Interestingly, male mice showed a greater benefit than did female mice.

Treated mice had higher hair cell count and neuronal density and, therefore, the enhanced preservation of outer hair cells. The drugs were associated with a reduction of approximately five decibels in the permanent threshold shift that can occur after noise exposure. A five-decibel difference is sufficient to make a difference in whether a person can hear ordinary conversation, the investigators noted.

When the investigators conducted immunocytochemistry and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests, the findings suggested that the drugs’ protective effects were linked to their action on alpha-1 subunits of calcium channel types in the cochlea. Therefore, the findings should be encouraging of clinical studies to test T-type calcium blockers to prevent and treat noise-induced hearing loss, they wrote.

Hearing Loss a Common Occupational Hazard

Jianxin Bao, PhD

Jianxin Bao, PhD

How would such a treatment work in people who are vulnerable to noise-induced hearing loss, such as military personnel and construction workers? In separate phone interviews with ENT Today, the study’s senior author and an expert in hearing loss commented on the study’s clinical implications.

“This study is the result of seeing whether drugs that were already approved by the Food and Drug Administration [FDA] had any potential to prevent or treat noise-induced hearing loss,” said senior author Jianxin Bao, PhD. “We found that antiepileptic drugs in this class may have some role, and therefore we tested trimethadione and ethosuximide.” Dr. Bao is a Research Associate Professor of Otolaryngology and head of the Central Institute for the Deaf’s Presbycuscis and Aging Laboratory at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Medical Education, Otology/Neurotology Issue: August 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • MP3 Generation: Noise-induced hearing loss rising among children and adolescents
  • Tests Lead to Recommendations for Preventing Music-Induced Hearing Loss
  • Falling on Deaf Ears: Hearing loss in older adults may be an undertreated condition
  • Ability to Heal from Hearing Damage Linked to Ear’s Circadian Rhythms

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939