• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Otolaryngologists on the Front Lines

by Gila Berkowitz • May 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Among the victims was a 31-year-old woman examined by otolaryngologists for facial burns and lacerations and bilateral traumatic tympanic membrane perforations. Itzhak Braverman, MD, Chief of Otolaryngology, removed a number of impacted blast fragments. The patient’s other wounds were extensive and led to surgery and prolonged hospitalization, so Dr. Braverman took the opportunity to send the excised fragments for thorough forensic analysis. By 2002 suicide bombers had begun using novel materials to magnify the impact of the primary blast: nail heads, ball bearings, even rat poison, so an investigation was imperative.

You Might Also Like

  • Talking to Otolaryngologists Who Placed Themselves on Front Lines of the COVID-19 Vaccination Effort
  • An Otolaryngologist as Flight Surgeon: One Doctor’s Experience in Operation Iraqi Freedom
  • Reconstruction and Premorbid Occlusion Establishment Keys for HN Trauma Treatment
  • Otolaryngologists Work to Heal Hearing Loss in U.S. Military Troops
Explore This Issue
May 2007

The lab showed the excised fragments to be human bone. Several tests were conducted. Thankfully, the fragments were free of HIV—but positive for HbsAg (hepatitis B), for which the patient was successfully treated.

The lesson for all front-line physicians—and the front line today includes not only war zones in the Middle East, but public places everywhere—is to be ready for absolutely anything. Suicide bombers in particular are often marginal members of their societies. Sometimes they are recruited with a promise to cleanse a perceived stain to the family’s honor through “martyrdom.” In the past bombers have included the mentally retarded, infertile women, and people accused of sexual misbehavior. They could be, as in the Hadera case, infected with disease.

A Short History of Body Armor

Helmets and body armor have been around almost as long as war itself. One cannot imagine Roman centurions or Spanish conquistadors without their characteristic defensive wear. But by the US Civil War metal armor was no match for enhanced firepower and the old shields were considered nothing but a nuisance.

In 1881 an Arizona physician, George Goodfellow, recorded the case of a man who had been shot in the heart and survived, thanks to the folded silk handkerchief in his breast pocket, which had deflected the bullet. The strength, flexibility, and light weight of silk made it a good material for the composition of the first “bulletproof” vests. Silk was precious, too. A century ago the vests cost the equivalent of $15,000 each.

Expense was no object to heads of state, and the Archduke Franz Ferdinand was wearing one on the fateful day in 1914 when he was assassinated by Gavrilo Princip, with the shot that sparked World War I. Unfortunately, the Archduke was hit above the vest, in the jugular vein.

The first World War brought innovation in the soldier’s personal defense. Steel helmets came into wide use, but experiments with body armor proved largely ineffective. During World War II steel helmets were virtually universal for combat troops, but body armor was still considered too bulky, heavy, and ineffective for standard issue. The most important innovation of the time was the flak jacket. These nylon vests were used only by air crews. “Flak,” non-direct fire, caused 75% of battlefield injuries during World War II, and ever more through the years. In Iraq and Afghanistan it causes more than 95% of injuries to American troops.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Career Development, Features Issue: May 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Talking to Otolaryngologists Who Placed Themselves on Front Lines of the COVID-19 Vaccination Effort
  • An Otolaryngologist as Flight Surgeon: One Doctor’s Experience in Operation Iraqi Freedom
  • Reconstruction and Premorbid Occlusion Establishment Keys for HN Trauma Treatment
  • Otolaryngologists Work to Heal Hearing Loss in U.S. Military Troops

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939