• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Outpatient Parotidectomies Associated with Lower Complication Rates Than Inpatient Parotidectomies

by Amy E. Hamaker • March 10, 2019

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What impact do parotidectomies have on postoperative complications compared to inpatient procedures?

Bottom line
Outpatient parotidectomies are associated with similar as well as decreased complication rates as compared with inpatient parotidectomies. 

You Might Also Like

  • Data Show Trend Toward Increased Use of and Improved Complication Rates for Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Approach to Pituitary Tumors
  • Complication Rates of Temporoparietal Fascia Free Flap Coverage
  • How Should Propranolol Be Initiated for Infantile Hemangiomas: Inpatient Versus Outpatient?
  • Electrocautery a Cost-Effective Alternative for Outpatient Pediatric Adenoidectomy
Explore This Issue
March 2019

Background: More than 90% of procedures of the ear, nose, mouth, or pharynx, were reported to the American Hospital Association as same-day procedures. However, strict criteria for patient selection and discharge are imperative due to the risk of procedure-specific adverse events, cardiac and pulmonary compromise, and other postoperative complications, and literature establishing outpatient parotidectomy safety is insufficient.

Study design: Retrospective analysis of parotidectomies 4,368 superficial or total parotidectomies performed between 2005 and 2014 (1,453 inpatient, 2,915 outpatient).

Setting: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

Synopsis: The inpatient cohort had significantly greater number of patients in older age groups than the outpatient cohort, and was more male. The outpatient cohort had a higher number of white patients. Higher prevalence of dyspnea, smoking, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, hypertension, transient ischemic attack, disseminated cancer, bleeding disorders, systemic sepsis, emergency, dependent functional status, and greater ASA American Society of Anesthesiology class (3 and 4) were significantly associated with the inpatient cohort. To account for patients undergoing multiple procedures, total work relative value units (RVUs) were contrasted between cohorts. Inpatient procedures were associated with larger total work RVUs and longer operative times than outpatient procedures. The most common cause for parotidectomy among cohorts was neoplasm (76.5% inpatient, 75.4% outpatient). Other causes included a swelling, mass, or lump (9.9%), sialadenitis (2.5%), and mucocele (1.8%). Higher rates of surgical and medical complications were associated with the inpatient cohort, specifically a greater prevalence of pneumonia. Researchers found no difference in readmission or reoperation frequency between cohorts. The most common procedures performed were incision and drainage of a hematoma, seroma, or fluid collection. Limitations included potential procedure miscoding and variations in inpatient/outpatient case difficulty and complexity.

Citation: Siddiqui SH, Singh R, Siddiqui E, et. al. Outpatient versus inpatient parotidectomy: comparison of postoperative complication rates. Laryngoscope. 2019;129:655–661.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Literature Reviews Tagged With: clinical outcome, parotidectomiesIssue: March 2019

You Might Also Like:

  • Data Show Trend Toward Increased Use of and Improved Complication Rates for Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Approach to Pituitary Tumors
  • Complication Rates of Temporoparietal Fascia Free Flap Coverage
  • How Should Propranolol Be Initiated for Infantile Hemangiomas: Inpatient Versus Outpatient?
  • Electrocautery a Cost-Effective Alternative for Outpatient Pediatric Adenoidectomy

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939