• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Pathology in the Digital Era

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • August 9, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Glassy and members of the Digital Pathology Association have participated in a number of meetings with the FDA to discuss the benefits of digital pathology and the potential risks that the technique may pose to patients. Dr. Glassy emphasized that, following these discussions, the FDA said that it would offer a less stringent review process for future digital pathology devices. Currently, digital pathology devices are categorized as class 3 devices, which are considered to carry the highest potential risk to patients and are therefore the most difficult to get approved. The FDA said that it would consider the next digital pathology device submitted for approval a “de novo” product, essentially making it easier for a new device to be approved.

You Might Also Like

  • Office Biopsies for Benign Pathology Diagnoses, Malignant Lesions
  • New Speech-Language Pathology Rule: Supervision of videostroboscopy and nasopharyngoscopy no longer required
  • How to Use Digital Signals to Facilitate Cancer Surgery
  • Epiglottitis Is Significant ED Pathology, Carries Mortality Risk
Explore This Issue
August 2016

Although FDA clearance is still pending for primary diagnosis, the FDA has cleared some digital pathology devices for image analysis) and for digital read of immunohistochemically-stained tissue slides, according to the FDA spokesperson.

According to Dr. Bauer, he and his colleagues are poised to adopt the use of digital pathology for primary diagnosis for a subset of cases once approved, given the successful results they’ve seen in their validation studies. “As work stations evolve and scanners become faster, there will be some role for digital pathology for primary diagnosis,” he said.

He expects that the first manufacturer to receive FDA approval for a digital pathology device to be used for primary diagnosis will probably occur later this year, with additional widespread approval and usage in the next year or two.


Mary Beth Nierengarten is a freelance medical writer based in Minnesota.

Key Points

  • Whole-slide imaging refers to the use of high-resolution scanners to scan entire microscopic slides rather than isolated higher magnification fields.
  • Digitized slides would allow multiple pathologists to look at a case in real time and create a permanent digital record to allow for future reviews of the patient’s material.
  • The pathologist may also be concerned that the provided image portrays enough data/histologic information to make a complete diagnosis.
  • Currently, the FDA has not approved any digital pathology whole-slide imaging device for primary diagnosis.

Additional Resources

  • Clinical Guidelines for Telepathology
  • Digital Pathology Association
  • Sectra: Where and how digitization affects the pathology workflow
  • Validating whole slide imaging for diagnostic purposes in pathology: guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center (Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013;137:1710-1722;)

Digital Pathology in Head and Neck Cases

For head and neck cases in particular, digital pathology can provide surgeons with rapid consultation diagnoses. “Many pathologists have a lot of difficulty with these tumors, so it is good for otolaryngologists and head and neck surgeons to recognize that this is a technology through which their pathologists can potentially seek quick consultations to get quick second opinions,” said Dr. Bauer.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: digital imaging, pathologyIssue: August 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Office Biopsies for Benign Pathology Diagnoses, Malignant Lesions
  • New Speech-Language Pathology Rule: Supervision of videostroboscopy and nasopharyngoscopy no longer required
  • How to Use Digital Signals to Facilitate Cancer Surgery
  • Epiglottitis Is Significant ED Pathology, Carries Mortality Risk

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939