• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

PHIS Tracheostomy Scorecard Measures Progress, Identifies Areas for Improvement

by Linda Kossoff • August 18, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) Tracheostomy Scorecard, and what is its potential for improving pediatric tracheostomy care?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy a Safe Alternative to Open Surgical Tracheostomy
  • Endoscopic Management More Cost Effective than Tracheostomy for BVFP
  • Neurologic Comorbidities and Failure to Thrive Associated with Unsuccessful Decannulation After Pediatric Tracheostomy
  • Progress in Chronic Laryngitis: Improvement in diagnosis but continuing debate
Explore This Issue
August 2023

The scorecard provides a valuable framework for identifying key areas for quality improvement (QI) and shared data that can be used to compare a hospital’s performance to that of peers.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric tracheostomy admissions are associated with prolonged hospital stay, complications, and high unplanned readmission rates. The Tracheostomy Scorecard is available in the PHIS, a database developed by the Children’s Hospital Association to help compare processes, outcomes, readmissions, and costs.

STUDY DESIGN: Comparative analysis.

SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers produced a Rapid Communication Article to describe the Tracheostomy Scorecard in the PHIS. The scorecard identifies patients who underwent tracheostomy, groups them by age, categorizes them as complicated or uncomplicated, and includes measures on process, outcome, readmission, and cost. Researchers analyzed PHIS data from 2021 (comprising 943 pediatric tracheostomies) and the home institution’s data (41 pediatric tracheostomies). The resulting analysis showed comparable data usable for QI analyses. Findings revealed opportunities for QI on multiple fronts, including process measures, where hearing evaluation for patients <1 year old were below 40%. Cost measures reinforced the financial burden of tracheostomy admissions, with averages of $346,027 for uncomplicated admissions and $1.04 million for complicated admissions at peer hospitals. Authors note PHIS’ limitations, such as differences in how individual hospitals count cases and report complete data.

CITATION: Kim J, Chorney SR, Kou Y-F, et al. A pediatric tracheostomy scorecard: a quality improvement tool for comparative analysis. Laryngoscope. 2023;133:1815–1817.

Filed Under: Laryngology, Laryngology, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Tagged With: tracheostomyIssue: August 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheostomy a Safe Alternative to Open Surgical Tracheostomy
  • Endoscopic Management More Cost Effective than Tracheostomy for BVFP
  • Neurologic Comorbidities and Failure to Thrive Associated with Unsuccessful Decannulation After Pediatric Tracheostomy
  • Progress in Chronic Laryngitis: Improvement in diagnosis but continuing debate

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Has experience as a patient influenced your professional development or demeanor?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Path to Department Chair: Arriving and Thriving

    • How Audiologists and Researchers Are Shaping Military Hearing Health Practices

    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • Rewriting the Rules of Rhinosinusitis

    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Why So Loud? Rethinking the Volume of Our Everyday Experiences
    • How Audiologists and Researchers Are Shaping Military Hearing Health Practices
    • A Case for Endoscopic Surgery: How Personal Experience Influenced Pursuit of a New Skill
    • The Path to Department Chair: Arriving and Thriving
    • Rewriting the Rules of Rhinosinusitis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939