• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

PQRI: ‘We’re from the Government, and We’re Here to Help’

by Gerard J. Gianoli, MD • January 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
From a purely incentive standpoint, the PQRI program will fail as it stands. In order for the program to succeed, physicians need to have a significant reward for their efforts. This is currently not the case.From a purely incentive standpoint, the PQRI program will fail as it stands. In order for the program to succeed, physicians need to have a significant reward for their efforts. This is currently not the case.

Many may say that even though this may seem to be very poor remuneration, it’s better than nothing. However, it’s actually worse than nothing. You have to consider what resources were employed to obtain this bonus, what are the consequences of being involved in this program, and you have to ask yourself if the resources employed playing this game would not have been better served elsewhere.

You Might Also Like

  • A Pay Cut by Any Other Name Is Still a Pay Cut
  • Reimbursement and Outcome Measurement in Otolaryngology Practices: What the Government Can Do to You and for You
  • Time to Comply with Physician Quality Reporting System Is Now
  • Not So Fast: New quality provisions aren’t ready for implementation, medical groups say
Explore This Issue
January 2009

In order to participate in the PQRI program, the above-mentioned group had to review material from CMS and select codes to be counted. They developed an internal office form to collect data on each patient and spent time teaching the staff and physicians how to use the form and collect the data. As you may suspect, this required a fair amount of work from the administrative and clinical staff of this busy practice. Below is a breakdown of the clinic’s conservative estimate of hours and costs associated with setting up this program:

Table 1

click for large version
Table 2

click for large version

After this, the data were collected on a daily basis. The forms were filled out, the data was keyed into the computerized billing system and then the claims were submitted to CMS. The cost associated with the daily review of each form for proper coding after the clinician filled out the form:

Altogether, the total minimum cost for setting up the program and administering the program on a daily basis came to $5796.20. Of course, this does not take into account any payment for the clinicians’ time and effort. For the effort of the clinicians’ above and their expenditure of their staff of $5796.20 in salary, they received a bonus from CMS of about $305. So they lost more than $5000 in getting rewarded by CMS-and that reward came about seven months after the end of the program. Since the bonus was received well into the next reporting period (July 2008), if this practice had reported in error and received no bonus, they would have continued their errors for half of the 2008 reporting cycle.

Some may say that participation in the PQRI program could be performed with much less expense than the above practice experienced. They may be right, but keep in mind that more than half of the practices that participated in the 2007 PQRI program received absolutely zero in bonus payment. The bottom line is, if you don’t dot your is and cross your ts, you won’t qualify for a bonus. Also, keep in mind that CMS holds the full power of the federal government. Just as failure to fill out your income tax forms correctly could result in the government asking for money and penalties back, incorrect PQRI forms could result in givebacks, penalties, and possibly accusations of fraud.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Health Policy, Tech Talk Issue: January 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • A Pay Cut by Any Other Name Is Still a Pay Cut
  • Reimbursement and Outcome Measurement in Otolaryngology Practices: What the Government Can Do to You and for You
  • Time to Comply with Physician Quality Reporting System Is Now
  • Not So Fast: New quality provisions aren’t ready for implementation, medical groups say

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Shifting the Treatment Goalpost Toward Medical Management of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939