• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Probe-Based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy Effective in Detecting Head and Neck Cancers

by Amy Hamaker • March 7, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

How feasible is the use of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) in standard practice for detecting head and neck cancers?

Background: pCLE is an emerging optical imaging technology that is rapidly being adopted for its ability to provide real-time, in-situ, histological visualization of tissue in the operating room. In 2013, oral cavity, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancers accounted for a combined 53,640 new cancer cases in the United States alone. Despite modern advances in diagnosis and treatment, prognosis remains poor.

You Might Also Like

  • Frozen Section Margins Highly Accurate in Predicting Final Margin Status in HN Cancer
  • Sarcopenia Significantly Associated with Poorer Overall Survival of Patients with Head and Neck Cancers
  • Blood-Based Diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancer
  • Probe-Based System Effective in Recognizing Parathyroid Glands During Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism
Explore This Issue
March 2016

Study design: Six nondysplasia, seven dysplasia, and 11 squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) cases reviewed at a single tertiary referral center.

Setting: Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport.

Synopsis: The study’s senior author formulated image classification criteria and descriptions alongside example pCLE images and short videos, which were incorporated into a brief slideshow. Seven surgeons and one pathologist at various levels of training and technology exposure completed the self-guided training slideshow. These practitioners were then given another slideshow of 50 pCLE images and 10 pCLE videos to review and categorize into normal or nondysplasia, dysplasia, or cancer.

Overall agreement among physicians and pathology reports was substantial. Highest accuracy was achieved in comparing the diagnosis of carcinoma versus nondysplastic tissue, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) each being 100%. Accuracy in the comparison of dysplasia and nondysplasia resulted in sensitivity 80%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, and NPV 80%. Accuracy in comparing carcinoma and dysplasia resulted in sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, and NPV 80%.

Limitations included a small sample size of observers who were not stratified based on prior experience, the use of all high-quality images, and post hoc rather than real-time image and video assessment.

Bottom line: pCLE allows for differentiation of normal mucosa, dysplasia, and invasive SCCA with high accuracy and reliability after short, self-guided training.

Citation: Moore C, Mehta V, Ma X, et al. Interobserver agreement of confocal laser endomicroscopy for detection of head and neck neoplasia. Laryngoscope. 2016;126:632-637.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Literature Reviews Tagged With: head and neck cancer, pCLE, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopyIssue: March 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Frozen Section Margins Highly Accurate in Predicting Final Margin Status in HN Cancer
  • Sarcopenia Significantly Associated with Poorer Overall Survival of Patients with Head and Neck Cancers
  • Blood-Based Diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancer
  • Probe-Based System Effective in Recognizing Parathyroid Glands During Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Cochlear Implants Improve Performance and Net Savings in Infants
    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939