• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Room for Improvement: Pediatric ambulatory centers could benefit from guidelines, panelists say

by Thomas R. Collins • October 8, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

BOSTON—Pediatric ambulatory surgery centers are fast-paced, high-volume places with many of the ingredients that can contribute to safety concerns, a patient safety expert from Children’s National Medical Center (CNMC) said at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS), held here Sept. 26-29.

You Might Also Like

  • OSA and Otolaryngology Procedures are Risk Factors for Unanticipated Hospital Admissions after Ambulatory Surgery in Kids
  • Revisit Diagnoses, Rates Similar for Ambulatory and Children’s Hospital Tonsillectomies
  • Benefits of Ambulatory Surgical Centers for Otolaryngology
  • Get Ready for Quality Improvement: Panelists outline helpful metrics and more
Explore This Issue
October 2010

Those concerns make it especially important for physicians to be aware of safety pitfalls and establish guidelines that fit each center, said Rahul Shah, MD, a pediatric otolaryngologist at the CNMC and co-chair of the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Committee of the AAO-HNS.

A 2006 national survey found that pediatric adenotonsillectomy was the second most common ambulatory procedure, behind myringotomy

A 2006 national survey found that pediatric adenotonsillectomy was the second most common ambulatory procedure, behind myringotomy

Dr. Shah was part of a panel on safety in pediatric ambulatory surgery centers that asked, “Is the bar too low?” The panel generally agreed that the bar is probably set correctly, because safety statistics show otolaryngology procedures at ambulatory centers are generally safe.

Ambulatory procedures in the U.S. have been on the rise: A 300 percent jump in procedures from 1996 to 2006 was almost entirely the result of increased volume in ambulatory centers, according to data presented by Ellis Arjmand, MD, PhD, medical director of the Ear and Hearing Center at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.

In pediatrics, otolaryngology traditionally accounts for a large number of pediatric ambulatory procedures, due largely to the high number of ear procedures, tonsillectomies and adenoidectomies performed on children. A 2006 national survey found that pediatric adenotonsillectomy was the second most common ambulatory procedure, behind myringotomy (Laryngoscope 2010;120:821-825).

Persistent Problems

A study on national safety data recorded for all types of procedures at all facilities (Ear Nose Throat J. 1996;75:710-714) gives some guidance for pediatric ambulatory centers, Dr. Shah said. It’s clear that several factors that have been found to contribute to safety problems are inherent at pediatric ambulatory centers, he said, even if they have been handled well according to safety statistics.

One of those factors is haste, he said. “We all know, perhaps by definition, that there is some haste in a surgery center,” he said.

In addition, because ambulatory centers tend to be smaller, problems may arise in situations requiring more resources than are available, he said.

“What happens if your cautery goes out? What happens if your anesthesia machine goes out?” Dr. Shah said. “Many facilities, including our own, have two anesthesia machines running [in] two rooms, so if you lose an anesthesia machine, that could be a problem.”

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Pediatric, Practice Focus Tagged With: AAO-HNS, emergency care, meeting coverage, outcomes, pediatric otolaryngology, quality of care, tonsillectomyIssue: October 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • OSA and Otolaryngology Procedures are Risk Factors for Unanticipated Hospital Admissions after Ambulatory Surgery in Kids
  • Revisit Diagnoses, Rates Similar for Ambulatory and Children’s Hospital Tonsillectomies
  • Benefits of Ambulatory Surgical Centers for Otolaryngology
  • Get Ready for Quality Improvement: Panelists outline helpful metrics and more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939