• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Impact of Shared Decision Making on Elective Surgery

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • June 1, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

A systematic review of the literature found that shared decision making reduces conflict and improves the quality of the decision for patients who are making choices about elective surgery. Specifically, the study found that shared decision making may influence patients to choose elective surgeries less often (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154:405-420).

You Might Also Like

  • No One-Size-Fits-All Technique or Clear Decision-Making Pattern for Treating Vocal Fold Sulcus/Scars
  • Patient Decision Aid Useful for Parents Offered Tonsillectomy for Their Children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Letter from the Editor: Making the Decision to Stop Operating
  • Caution Regarding Elective Neck Dissection During Salvage Surgery

Shared decision making, a communication process that emphasizes discussion between clinicians and their patients of all treatment alternatives in the context of patient/family values, has been proposed as a strategy to reduce overuse of surgical care. Little data is available on the impact of shared decision making on elective surgical practice.

To fill this gap, Emily Boss, MD, with the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore, and her colleagues, performed a systematic review of the literature of studies published between January 1990 and August 2015 in which elective surgical care could be ascertained. Of the 10,929 studies identified, 24 met inclusion criteria of elective surgeries (seven in the spine, five in joints, and four in gynecology) and 20 studies included used decision aids or support tools (13 used multimedia/video, three used written tools, and four used personal coaching).

The report found that the effect of shared decision making on the preference for surgery was mixed across the studies, but did find that shared decision making tended to improve decision quality, knowledge, and preparation while reducing decision conflict.

The impact of shared decision making on elective surgery for children is more vague, said the authors, as only two studies focusing on children met study inclusion.

Dr. Boss emphasized that these findings may be particularly relevant to otolaryngologists given the high proportion of elective surgical cases in otolaryngology. “As such, physicians should share information regarding all treatment alternatives wholly and transparently with families to ensure that parents can make a decision that is right for their child,” she said.

 

Filed Under: Online Exclusives, Pediatric, Practice Focus Tagged With: pediatrics, shared decision making

You Might Also Like:

  • No One-Size-Fits-All Technique or Clear Decision-Making Pattern for Treating Vocal Fold Sulcus/Scars
  • Patient Decision Aid Useful for Parents Offered Tonsillectomy for Their Children with Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • Letter from the Editor: Making the Decision to Stop Operating
  • Caution Regarding Elective Neck Dissection During Salvage Surgery

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • MRI Surveillance Should Extend to 10 Years Post- Op for Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939