• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

State of the Art in Tonsillectomy

by Pippa Wysong • July 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

ORLANDO, FL-Even though tonsillectomies are a commonly performed procedure, research continues to find out more about how to best do the surgery, as well as other values of the procedure. At the recent annual Combined Otolaryngology Spring Meeting, attendees heard a comparison of different techniques for performing them, as well as a description of a novel combined tonsillectomy and sphincter pharyngoplasty procedure for treating patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency.

You Might Also Like

  • Tonsillectomy Techniques: Tradition versus Technology?
  • New Data on Tonsillectomy: Behavior Advantages and Best Technique
  • Electrocautery a Cost-Effective Alternative for Outpatient Pediatric Adenoidectomy
  • State-of-the-Art Techniques Are Tempting, but May Not Improve Care
Explore This Issue
July 2008
John D. Donaldson, MD

John D. Donaldson, MD

Augustine L. Moscatello, MD, Associate Professor of Otolaryngology at Westchester Medical Center in New York, described the various approaches surgeons use on tonsillectomies. There are about 263,000 tonsillectomies performed in the United States each year, making it one of the leading pediatric surgical procedures in the country. The preference for which procedure should be used has changed over the past 30 years. In the 1980s, electrocautery coagulation-dissection gained favor and is now probably the most commonly used approach. It is associated with less bleeding, but patients have more postoperative pain, he said.

Coblator and microdebrider techniques have also gained popularity. Both techniques remove about 90% of the tonsillar tissue, while leaving a thin rim laterally-this avoids disruption of the tonsillar capsule, he said. Coblation works by dissociating isotonic saline between the electrodes of the coblator. It breaks the bonds between cells, and reaches a temperature of between 45°C and 85°C. A microdebrider works by shaving tonsillar tissue from the inferior medial pole-proceeding superior laterally. It preserves the tonsillar capsule along with a thin rim.

Which Technique Is Best?

But are any of these commonly used techniques superior? A prospective, double-blind study was launched to help answer that question. It compared the three techniques and their surgical parameters, efficacy, and morbidity in a series of pediatric patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

A total of 156 patients, aged six months to 22 years, were entered into the study. Exclusions from the study included craniofacial dysmorphism, cerebral palsy, asymmetrical tonsillar hypertrophy, and other complicating conditions. The surgery was performed by one of two surgeons for uniformity in the procedures.

Patients were placed into one of three treatment groups. A total of 53 patients were treated with extracapsular electrocautery (a Teflon-coated spatula [Bovie] with a coagulation setting of 10W); 53 underwent coblation (an EVAC-70 handpiece [ENTec] probe with a standard setting of ablation at 7, and coagulation set to 3). Another 53 patients were treated with a Zomed or Gyrus microdebrider set at 1500 RPM was used.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Laryngology, Medical Education, Pediatric, Practice Focus, Sleep Medicine Tagged With: Obstructive sleep apnea, outcomes, pediatrics, research, surgery, techniques, tonsillectomy, treatmentIssue: July 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Tonsillectomy Techniques: Tradition versus Technology?
  • New Data on Tonsillectomy: Behavior Advantages and Best Technique
  • Electrocautery a Cost-Effective Alternative for Outpatient Pediatric Adenoidectomy
  • State-of-the-Art Techniques Are Tempting, but May Not Improve Care

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939