• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

State of the Art in Tonsillectomy

by Pippa Wysong • July 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Surgical time varied, depending on the device used: It was a mean of 21.6 minutes for the cautery group; 20.2 minutes for the coblation group, and 16.14 minutes in the microdebrider group. Patients returned to a normal diet a mean of 6.36 days, 4.85 days, and 4.59 days in the cautery, coblation, and microdebrider groups, respectively. The differences were statistically significant.

You Might Also Like

  • Tonsillectomy Techniques: Tradition versus Technology?
  • New Data on Tonsillectomy: Behavior Advantages and Best Technique
  • Electrocautery a Cost-Effective Alternative for Outpatient Pediatric Adenoidectomy
  • State-of-the-Art Techniques Are Tempting, but May Not Improve Care
Explore This Issue
July 2008

There was also a significant difference in how long it took for patients to return to normal activity levels. This ranged from a mean of 6.57 days, to 4.72 days, to 4.51 days, respectively.

Kids recover faster from coblation or the microdebrider, Dr. Moscatello said. Among the three groups, there was no significant difference in rates of postoperative complications, including problems such as fever or voice change.

Dr. Moscatello noted there are significant differences in the prices of the three devices. The Bovie electrocautery spatula costs only $5.34, whereas the coblator wand for the EVAC-70 costs $370, and the microdebrider blade costs $89.40. When it came to total costs (device and OR cost), they were a mean of $2825.10 for cautery, $3007.06 for coblation, and $2199.03 for the microdebrider.

Cost is something that doctors may want to discuss with patients, especially those who have poor or no insurance coverage, he said. Still, overall recovery time is shorter with use of a coblator or microdebrider-something else to keep in mind.

Tonsillectomy and Sphincter Pharyngoplasty

Could patients benefit from a one-size-fits-all approach to velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after cleft palate repair? This is what is being proposed by a Florida-based surgeon who suggests a possible effective initial intervention, which entails performing a tonsillectomy and sphincter pharyngoplasty as a combined procedure.

VPI is a common consequence in children who were born with clefting of the soft palate, even after the anatomy appears to have been surgically normalized. Children with the problem have speech distortion due to an inability to close the nasopharyngeal airway on the production of phonemes.

It can lead to mild distortions on a few sounds to a complete lack of intelligibility, said John D. Donaldson, MD, Board Chairman at Lee Memorial Health System in Fort Myers, FL.

Children with clefts and other craniofacial abnormalities should be cared for by a multidisciplinary team. The problem is that although anatomy can be relatively well repaired, functional outcome is not always at its best. Over the years, various procedures have been developed and tried to correct VPI with varying levels of success.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Laryngology, Medical Education, Pediatric, Practice Focus, Sleep Medicine Tagged With: Obstructive sleep apnea, outcomes, pediatrics, research, surgery, techniques, tonsillectomy, treatmentIssue: July 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Tonsillectomy Techniques: Tradition versus Technology?
  • New Data on Tonsillectomy: Behavior Advantages and Best Technique
  • Electrocautery a Cost-Effective Alternative for Outpatient Pediatric Adenoidectomy
  • State-of-the-Art Techniques Are Tempting, but May Not Improve Care

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • MRI Surveillance Should Extend to 10 Years Post- Op for Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939