• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

T1W Imaging May Aid in Diagnosing Cholesteatomas

by ENTtoday • August 7, 2018

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • High-Resolution CT and Diffusion-Weighted MRI Combo Improves Pediatric Cholesteatoma Detection
  • Intrathecal Gd-MRC demonstrated to be the most useful diagnostic method to detect CSF rhinorrhea
  • MRI Is Cost-Effective for Diagnosing Asymmetric SNHL
  • Can Radiologic Imaging Replace Second-Look Procedures for Cholesteatoma?
Explore This Issue
August 2018

Comment: The non-echo planar diffusion-weighted MRI (non-EP DWI) sequence is efficient in identifying the restricted diffusion in the substance of cholesteatoma, and, thanks to its sensitivity and precision, has changed the way otolaryngologists manage chronic ear disease. Even in diagnostic testing with high sensitivity and specificity, false positives and false negatives occur. In an attempt to decrease the incidence of erroneous results, we can examine the role of T1 imaging in cholesteatoma diagnosis. On T1 imaging, cholesteatomas are characteristically hypointense.
These authors examined 57 ears in 53 patients. A positive non-EP DWI alone identified 93% of the 46 ears with cholesteatoma (sensitivity), but a negative non-EP DWI only excluded cholesteatoma in 63% of patients who did not harbor cholesteatomas (specificity). When T1 imaging was added, 89% of cholesteatomas were correctly identified (sensitivity), but all (100%) 11 patients who did not have cholesteatoma were identified (specificity). Accuracy as defined by (true positives + true negatives)/all patients, improved from 87.7% for non-EP DWI alone to 91.2% with the addition of T1 imaging.
Because not every patient with nonspecific opacification of the mastoid on CT has cholesteatoma, and because non-cholesteatomatous ear disease may not require surgery, the results from the study could further help clinicians make decisions about treatment of the patient with chronic ear disease. —Samuel H. Selesnick, MD

What is the usefulness of T1-weighted (T1W) imaging on diagnostic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for cholesteatoma?

Bottom line
T1W imaging may aid in the exclusion of false-positive cases on diagnostic non-EP DW MR imaging for cholesteatomas. A combination of non-EP DW and T1W imaging may improve the specificity and accuracy compared with non-EP DW imaging alone.

Study design: retrospective case review.

Setting: Tertiary referral center, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan

Synopsis: The authors identified 53 patients (57 ears) suspected to have cholesteatomas. Intervention included preoperative MR imaging, including non-echo planar (non-EP) diffusion-weighted (DW) and T1W imaging.

The primary outcome measures included the comparison between the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of cholesteatomas using non-EP DW imaging alone (criterion 1) and non-EP DW imaging along with T1W imaging (criterion 2). Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated in each case by comparing MR imaging with surgical findings. Secondary outcome measures included the comparison of the rates of cases showing a high T1W signal between cholesteatomas and noncholesteatomas, which showed a high non-EP DW signal.

The authors found that the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy according to criterion 1 were 93.5, 63.6, and 87.7% and according to criterion 2 were 89.1, 100, and 91.2%, respectively. Of 43 cholesteatoma cases indicating a high non-EP DW signal, only two cases showed a high T1W signal (5%). On the other hand, all four noncholesteatoma cases indicating high non-EP DW signal showed a high T1W signal (100%), and these rates were significantly different (p < 0.001).

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: cholesteatomas, T1W imagingIssue: August 2018

You Might Also Like:

  • High-Resolution CT and Diffusion-Weighted MRI Combo Improves Pediatric Cholesteatoma Detection
  • Intrathecal Gd-MRC demonstrated to be the most useful diagnostic method to detect CSF rhinorrhea
  • MRI Is Cost-Effective for Diagnosing Asymmetric SNHL
  • Can Radiologic Imaging Replace Second-Look Procedures for Cholesteatoma?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939