• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Testing for Decreased Smell Function May Help Identify Coronavirus Patients Earlier

by Linda Kossoff • June 15, 2020

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Could olfactory testing on COVID-19 patients help identify individuals in need of early treatment or quarantine?

Bottom Line: Decreased smell function is a major marker for SARS-CoV-2 infection; therefore, smell testing may help to identify COVID-19 patients in need of early treatment or quarantine.

You Might Also Like

  • Psychophysical Testing of Chemosensory Function During COVID-19 Infection Shows Recovery Trend
  • Women, Patients with Severe Dysfunction Less Likely to Regain Smell, Taste After COVID-19
  • Smell and Taste Disorder Differences Seen Between Long-Term COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 Patients
  • No Correlation Between SARS- CoV-2 Viral Load and Olfactory Psychophysical Scores in COVID-19 Patients
Explore This Issue
June 2020

Commentary: “This is the only study in which quantitative olfactory testing has actually been performed in a cohort of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infected patients, demonstrating that 59 of 60 patients exhibited demonstrable smell loss, with over half having anosmia or severe microsmia. Only 35% of the patients were aware of the loss, emphasizing the limitations of self-reports of smell dysfunction—a limitation well known in the chemosensory literature.” —Timothy Smith, MD

Background: Numerous reports cited in media indicate that anosmia occurs in persons who contracted COVID-19 by exposure to the SARS-COV-02 virus. Validated quantitative olfactory testing has not been performed in a cohort of COVID-19 patients. Therefore, the proportion of affected patients, and the magnitude of their deficits, is not known.

Study design: Case-control study.

Setting: Masih Daneshvari Hospital and Institute for Research in Fundamental Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Synopsis: Researchers administered the Persian version of the 40-odorant University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test to 60 hospitalized COVID-19 patients in the disease recovery period, plus 60 matched controls, to assess the presence, magnitude, and frequency of olfactory dysfunction. Clinical severity was classified as mild, moderate, or severe according to Massachusetts General Hospital COVID-19 treatment guidance for treatment algorithm. Epidemiological risk factors included age > 55 years and hypertension/cardiovascular, pulmonary or kidney disease, as well as compromised immunity. Results showed that 98% of the COVID-19 patients exhibited marked olfactory dysfunction seemingly independent of severe nasal congestion or inflammation, and 58% were either anosmic or severely microsmic. In contrast, of the 60 controls, 82% were normal and 18% had only mild dysfunction. The major limitation is the sample of the study population at only one point in time relative to the onset of COVID-19 symptoms.

Citation: Moein ST, Hashemian SMR, Mansourafshar B, et al. Smell dysfunction: a biomarker for COVID-19 [published online ahead of print April 17, 2020]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. doi:10.1002/air.22587.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: coronavirus, COVID19, diagnosisIssue: June 2020

You Might Also Like:

  • Psychophysical Testing of Chemosensory Function During COVID-19 Infection Shows Recovery Trend
  • Women, Patients with Severe Dysfunction Less Likely to Regain Smell, Taste After COVID-19
  • Smell and Taste Disorder Differences Seen Between Long-Term COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 Patients
  • No Correlation Between SARS- CoV-2 Viral Load and Olfactory Psychophysical Scores in COVID-19 Patients

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Cochlear Implants Improve Performance and Net Savings in Infants
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939