• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

The End of the Public Health Emergency: What It Means for Telehealth

by Emily A. Johnson, JD • August 15, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Do you remember where you were when the COVID-19 public health emergency (PHE) was declared on Jan. 31, 2020? While it may seem like yesterday, you would be forgiven for not recalling your exact location over three years ago, during what felt like an incredible whirlwind for the healthcare industry.

You Might Also Like

  • AMA Adopts Policy to Combat Public Health Disinformation by Healthcare Professionals
  • COVID-19 Pandemic: Dealing with Emergency Waivers, Provider Relief Funding, and Potential Audits
  • Masks Off: Adaptability in the Face of Emergency
  • Department of Health and Human Services’ Final Rule Expands HIPAA Obligations, Violation Penalties
Explore This Issue
August 2023

One possible location you may have found yourself in was a meeting room, quickly trying to make adjustments to how you would deliver care during the pandemic. What emerged was a pleasant surprise: Not only did healthcare providers implement telehealth to respond to the pandemic, but it was largely successful—and popular.

But time marches on, and the PHE—due to advances in COVID-19 treatments and widespread availability of vaccines—ended in early May 2023. The end of the PHE signals many changes in the healthcare industry, but among the most important will be changes to the use of telehealth. For those looking to avoid another scramble, this article will assist in a successful transition to the post-PHE telehealth era.

Platform for Telehealth

One of the first telehealth changes taking place, as of the day the PHE expired, is the end of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Civil Rights (OCR) enforcement discretion regarding the use of HIPAA-compliant platforms when providing telehealth services. From March 17, 2020, until May 11, 2023, the OCR stated that any non-public-facing platform could be used for telehealth because it wouldn’t be imposing penalties on providers who followed this.

For clinicians, that meant any number of routes could be used to conduct a telehealth service. So long as the platform didn’t post the service to a public area of the internet, such as someone’s Facebook page, it could be used for telehealth.

This enforcement discretion has ended, however, and clinicians will need to use HIPAA-compliant platforms and have a business associate agreement in place with that platform’s operators. On April 11, 2023, the OCR released a statement that it would institute a 90-calendar-day transition period for covered healthcare providers to come into compliance with HIPAA rules. The OCR’s enforcement discretion will continue from the period of May 12, 2023, until Aug. 9, 2023, after which the OCR will no longer exercise enforcement discretion and will begin once again imposing penalties for noncompliance.

Several platforms are available, so if you aren’t sure which one you use, seek counsel to ensure your platform and the business associate agreement are HIPAA compliant under post-PHE rules.

Prescribing Controlled Substances

Another exception that expired at the end of the PHE is the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) exception to requirements for separate DEA registrations in all states where patients being prescribed controlled substances by telehealth are located.

During the PHE, if a clinician was registered with the DEA in any state, they didn’t need to register in other states where they were prescribing or dispensing controlled substances via telehealth, if state law allowed. Now that the PHE has expired, clinicians once again need to register with the DEA in all states in which their patients are located.

An in-person medical evaluation is also once again required to prescribe Schedule 2–5 substances through telehealth.

Delayed Changes

Happily, many more telehealth changes post-PHE won’t take effect until the end of 2024. One telehealth policy that will remain through Dec. 31, 2024, is that clinicians can provide telehealth services to patients regardless of their geographic location. The ability to provide services across state lines has been a popular option for some practices during the pandemic; the HHS cautions, however, that this allowance is subject to individual state laws, which may prevent interstate telehealth services.

Also extended until Dec. 31, 2024, is the ability to provide telehealth services to Medicare patients in their homes, as well as providing audio-only telehealth services to patients. The HHS has provided guidance for how audio-only telehealth can remain compliant after the OCR’s enforcement discretion ends.

Importantly, clinicians should note that landlines will not violate HIPAA, whereas cell phones or other electronic communication technologies may. Clinicians should take reasonable steps to ensure their audio-only service is private, that the patient’s identity is verified, and that auxiliary aids or services are used as appropriate to ensure the effectiveness of the communication.

No Change Expected

Some telehealth changes made as a result of the PHE will remain in place permanently. Most of these changes deal with the provision of behavioral health or mental health services. However, with any of the changes made due to the PHE, it’s important to stay informed about any other extensions or guidance that may be implemented even after the end of 2024. As industries adjust their businesses post-PHE, additional action may be taken by federal or state governments to preserve telehealth changes that are popular with the general public.

The end of the public health emergency signals many changes in the healthcare industry, but among the most important will be changes to the use of telehealth. —Emily A. Johnson, JD

As the PHE comes to an end, it’s a convenient time to consider telehealth best practices. Over time, enforcement agencies may be less sympathetic to claims of “trying to do one’s best” when it comes to telehealth services. To prepare, take time now to review your telehealth policies, procedures, and training, and ensure that you have adequate privacy and security available for telehealth services.

Now is also a good time to review the clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction scores for telehealth services. If there are any concerns, take action to modify practices so you can improve your metrics.

Finally, as the post-PHE telehealth landscape comes into focus, determine whether additional opportunities exist to expand your business via telehealth.

The PHE is a federal declaration, which means that state laws still must be considered when reviewing your telehealth program. As each state has its own unique telehealth regulatory framework, it will be important for clinicians to review the regulations in each state in which they provide services. To ensure that your practice is compliant with state regularions, be sure to review the requirements surrounding licensure, informed consent, standards of care, prescriptions, and reimbursement.

While no one in the healthcare industry would have chosen the COVID-19 pandemic as the route through which telehealth gained serious traction among consumers, clinicians and patients alike have found numerous advantages to the use of the technologies. As the world tilts steadily back toward more familiar times, clinicians have a chance to reflect on their experience with telehealth during the pandemic, to transition successfully out of the exceptions made, and to push forward toward a rewarding future with telehealth that is free of legal troubles.


Emily Johnson, JD, is a nationally recognized attorney, author, and speaker with McDonald Hopkins LLC. Email her at ejohnson@mcdonaldhopkins.com.

Reprinted with permission from the American College of Rheumatology.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Departments, Home Slider, Legal Matters Tagged With: COVID19, telehealthIssue: August 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • AMA Adopts Policy to Combat Public Health Disinformation by Healthcare Professionals
  • COVID-19 Pandemic: Dealing with Emergency Waivers, Provider Relief Funding, and Potential Audits
  • Masks Off: Adaptability in the Face of Emergency
  • Department of Health and Human Services’ Final Rule Expands HIPAA Obligations, Violation Penalties

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939