• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Microsuture Vocal Fold Microflap Closure Stronger than Fibrin Glue Closure

by Amy E. Hamaker • January 13, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Which microflap closure technique is stronger, fibrin glue or microsuture?

Background: The use of a microsuture for closing vocal fold defects allows for healing by primary intention and aligns the incision with the leading edge of the vocal fold. More expeditious alternative closure methods, including fibrin glue, novel sutures, and bioabsorbable microscopic clips, have been sought. The efficacy of any wound closure, including its ability to remain intact, is dependent on its ability to maintain its strength in the face of mechanical stress.

You Might Also Like

  • Fibrin Glue Makes Septal Perforations Easier to Repair
  • Vocal Fold Augmentation Improves Dyspnea Symptoms for Glottic Insufficiency
  • Nimodipine May Promote Functional Recovery in Patients with Acute Vocal Fold Paralysis
  • Vocal Fold Hemorrhage Has Little Impact on Vocal Function and Health
Explore This Issue
January 2015

Study design: Basic research done on bovine and porcine vocal fold models.

Setting: Department of Otolaryngology, Center for Voice, Airay and Swallowing, Medical College of Georgia at Georgia Regents University, Augusta.

Synopsis: Six excised bovine vocal folds were tested on the universal testing system. Model failure occurred at an average extension of 22.6 mm, corresponding to mean force of 11.61 N. Microflap closure with fibrin glue demonstrated no appreciable tension resistance, with closure failing on initial tension application. Five excised porcine vocal folds were used for each condition in further testing. No significant difference was found in the tensile load of the control (no closure performed) and fibrin glue cohorts at all measured distraction levels. The microsuture group was able to achieve higher tensile loads at increased distraction, reaching significance at 10 mm. Because this was an ex vivo study, histologic examination of the vocal fold at various points during the healing process was not possible. Limitations included study of only one fibrin sealant type, unknown interaction between fibrin glue and animal tissue, testing of the entire closure rather than the fibrin clot itself, and the model’s ability to apply force in only one vector, although this is the most common method for testing tensile strength.

Bottom line: Despite study limitations, there is no significant difference in tensile strength of microflaps closed with fibrin glue or not closed, while suture microflap closure provides a significantly stronger mechanical closure compared to no closure.

Citation: Myer CM IV, Johnson CM, Postma GN, Weinberger PM. Comparison of tensile strength of fibrin glue and suture in microflap closure. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:167-170.


Reviewed by Amy E. Hamaker

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Literature Reviews Tagged With: vocal fold microflapIssue: January 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • Fibrin Glue Makes Septal Perforations Easier to Repair
  • Vocal Fold Augmentation Improves Dyspnea Symptoms for Glottic Insufficiency
  • Nimodipine May Promote Functional Recovery in Patients with Acute Vocal Fold Paralysis
  • Vocal Fold Hemorrhage Has Little Impact on Vocal Function and Health

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Has experience as a patient influenced your professional development or demeanor?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024

    • Rewriting the Rules of Rhinosinusitis

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Why So Loud? Rethinking the Volume of Our Everyday Experiences
    • How Audiologists and Researchers Are Shaping Military Hearing Health Practices
    • A Case for Endoscopic Surgery: How Personal Experience Influenced Pursuit of a New Skill
    • The Path to Department Chair: Arriving and Thriving
    • Rewriting the Rules of Rhinosinusitis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939