• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Chemotherapy Alone Not Recommended for Advanced Laryngeal or Hypopharyngeal Cancer

by Christine G. Gourin, MD, FACS • October 8, 2010

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Is treatment with chemotherapy alone feasible for advanced laryngeal or hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma?

You Might Also Like

  • Induction Chemotherapy in Oropharynx Cancers Produces Good Long-Term Outcomes
  • Induction Chemotherapy for Base of Tongue Cancer Under Study
  • Sociodemographics Affect Treatment, Outcome of Advanced Laryngeal Cancer
  • What Is the Role of Induction Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma?
Explore This Issue
October 2010

Background: A favorable response to induction chemotherapy has been shown to be predictive of response to chemoradiation in patients with advanced laryngeal squamous cell cancer. Because of the adverse long-term sequelae of radiation therapy, including fibrosis and dysphagia, this study sought to determine if patients with advanced laryngeal cancer who had a favorable response to one cycle of induction chemotherapy could be successfully treated with subsequent chemotherapy alone.

Study design: Single arm phase II trial of patients with stage III or IVA laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer. All patients underwent induction chemotherapy with one cycle of cisplatin or carboplatin + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Patients with a complete clinical and histological response (measured by biopsy) after induction chemotherapy underwent subsequent treatment with chemotherapy alone, consisting of three additional alternating cycles of chemotherapy: cisplatin or carboplatin + 5-FU for cycles two and four, and weekly docetaxel for three weeks comprising the third cycle. Patients with a partial response to induction chemotherapy, defined as >50 percent reduction in primary tumor size, underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin or carboplatin.

Nonresponders, defined as those with <50 percent reduction in primary tumor size after induction chemotherapy, were treated with laryngectomy and postoperative radiation. After definitive treatment, response to therapy was determined by exam under anesthesia eight weeks after the completion of definitive chemotherapy or chemoradiation. Complete responders received an additional two cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin or carboplatin + 5-FU.

Setting: University of Michigan

Synopsis: Thirty-two patients were enrolled between 2002-2004. Eleven patients (34 percent) had T4 tumors and 20 percent required pretreatment tracheostomy. Four patients (13 percent) had hypopharyngeal tumors. Only one patient (3 percent) had N3 disease; 10 patients (31 percent) had N0 disease.

Four patients (13 percent) had a complete response to induction chemotherapy and received chemotherapy alone, while four patients (13 percent) had less than a 50 percent response to induction chemotherapy and were treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy. None of the four patients treated with chemotherapy alone were disease-free at the completion of chemotherapy, and all four experienced failure in the neck. The three-year disease-specific survival was 78 percent; it was 25 percent in patients treated with chemotherapy alone and 100 percent in nonresponders to induction chemotherapy treated with surgery followed by radiation.

Bottom line: Organ preservation with chemotherapy alone is not feasible in patients with advanced laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: chemotherapy, clinical, hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, laryngology, treatmentIssue: October 2010

You Might Also Like:

  • Induction Chemotherapy in Oropharynx Cancers Produces Good Long-Term Outcomes
  • Induction Chemotherapy for Base of Tongue Cancer Under Study
  • Sociodemographics Affect Treatment, Outcome of Advanced Laryngeal Cancer
  • What Is the Role of Induction Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939