• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Airbags, Seat Belts Help Prevent Facial Fractures

September 1, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Nearly 11% percent of patients examined at trauma centers following motor vehicle collisions had at least one facial fracture, and airbags and seat belts were associated with reduced likelihood of those fractures, according to the results of a study recently published in JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery.

You Might Also Like

  • Are Prophylactic Antibiotics Useful in the Management of Facial Fractures?
  • Patients With Isolated Mandible Fractures Should Be Screened for Concussion
  • Physical Assault Is Increasingly the Most Significant Mechanism of Operative Facial Trauma in Adults
  • When is the Optimal Time to Reduce Pediatric Nasal Bone Fractures?

David A. Hyman, MD, an otolaryngologist at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health in Madison, and his coauthors used data from the National Trauma Data Bank to assess facial fractures in motor vehicle collisions (MVCs) reported by trauma centers from 2007 through 2012. The data included 518,106 individuals who were involved in an MVC and required assessment at a trauma center. The researchers found that, of those patients, 56,422 (10.9%) sustained facial fractures.

Of the patients who presented at trauma centers with facial fractures, 5.8% had airbag protection alone, 26.9% used only a seat belt, and 9.3% used both airbags and seat belts, while 57.6% used no protective device.

The investigators estimated that the use of an airbag alone reduced the likelihood of sustaining any facial fracture by 18% when compared with using no protective device. A seat belt cut the likelihood by 43%, and the combination of seat belts and airbags decreased the likelihood by 53%.

Filed Under: Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Online Exclusives, Practice Focus Tagged With: facial fracture, facial trauma

You Might Also Like:

  • Are Prophylactic Antibiotics Useful in the Management of Facial Fractures?
  • Patients With Isolated Mandible Fractures Should Be Screened for Concussion
  • Physical Assault Is Increasingly the Most Significant Mechanism of Operative Facial Trauma in Adults
  • When is the Optimal Time to Reduce Pediatric Nasal Bone Fractures?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you served as an expert witness in a case that’s gone to trial?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
    • Composition and Priorities of Multidisciplinary Pediatric Thyroid Programs: A Consensus Statement
    • Artificial Intelligence as Author: Can Scientific Reviewers Recognize GPT- 4o–Generated Manuscripts?
    • Self-Administered Taste Testing Without Water: Normative Data for the 53-Item WETT
    • Long-Term Particulate Matter Exposure May Increase Risk of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis: Results from an Exposure-Matched Study

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939