• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Induction Chemotherapy in Oropharynx Cancers Produces Good Long-Term Outcomes

by ENTToday • December 11, 2018

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Chemotherapy Alone Not Recommended for Advanced Laryngeal or Hypopharyngeal Cancer
  • Induction Chemotherapy for Base of Tongue Cancer Under Study
  • Fanconi Anemia Patients with HNSCC Tolerate Surgery Better than Radiation, Chemotherapy
  • Transoral Robotic Surgery, Chemotherapy Outcomes Similar in Patients with AOC
Explore This Issue
December 2018

Comment: This is a phase 2 study of chemo only followed by surgery for HPV OP cancer. Twenty-nine of 39 patients who underwent surgery avoided radiation. Interesting because it maybe that chemo response may be the future of this treatment. —Adam Zanation, MD

Would an induction regimen with a high response rate and low toxicity partner well with transoral endoscopic surgery to treat transorally resectable squamous head and neck cancer?

Bottom Line
Neoadjuvant, systemic therapy and surgical resection followed by risk-adapted adjuvant therapy resulted in high response rates and excellent long-term outcomes, allowing a high number of patients to avoid radiation therapy.

Background: Treatment of locally advanced oropharynx cancer has evolved substantially, with chemoradiotherapy offering an alternative to large, morbid surgical resections. Induction chemotherapy has been proposed for both HPV-positive patients who have a good prognosis, to de-intensify definitive radiation therapy for patients with an excellent response, and for those with a poorer prognosis, as an additive therapy to standard care.

Study design: Retrospective case-control study of 40 patients accrued between October 3, 2012, and August 23, 2016.

Setting: Department of Hematology and Oncology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Synopsis: Thirty of 40 patients had oropharyngeal cancer; 17 of these patients had low-risk HPV. Twenty percent of patients had stage III disease, and 80% had stage IV disease. Thirty-nine of 40 patients underwent surgery. Thirty-seven of the remaining 39 patients completed three-part therapy. Three patients were hospitalized during induction chemotherapy. (In this study, lapatinib was substituted for cetuximab.) Generally, toxicity was mild, with diarrhea as the most common adverse event. The clinical response rate was 93%, and the clinical complete response rate was 40%. Fourteen of 39 patients had a pathologic complete response. (Clinical response was not associated with pathologic complete response.) Seven patients entered with study-defined, low-risk disease; 25 entered with study-defined, medium-risk disease; and seven entered with study-defined, high-risk disease. Five of the low-risk patients remained in the low-risk group, 21 medium-risk patients changed to the low-risk group, and four high-risk patients changed to the low-risk group. At a median follow-up of 2.4 years, no patient has recurred or died. Patients who received radiation lost more weight between study initiation and one year postsurgery. Swallowing and, on average, voice were well preserved.

Citation: Weiss JM. Grilley-Olson JE, Deal AM, et al. Phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and transoral endoscopic surgery with risk-adapted adjuvant therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer. 2018;124:2986–2992.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Literature Reviews Tagged With: cinical care, oropharynx cancer, outcomes, treatmentIssue: December 2018

You Might Also Like:

  • Chemotherapy Alone Not Recommended for Advanced Laryngeal or Hypopharyngeal Cancer
  • Induction Chemotherapy for Base of Tongue Cancer Under Study
  • Fanconi Anemia Patients with HNSCC Tolerate Surgery Better than Radiation, Chemotherapy
  • Transoral Robotic Surgery, Chemotherapy Outcomes Similar in Patients with AOC

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939