• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Topical Mitomycin-C Offers No Additional Benefit in Surgical LTS Management

by Amy E. Hamaker • March 11, 2020

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the efficacy of topical mitomycin-C (MMC) in the treatment of laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) patients compared to a placebo-controlled group?

Bottom Line: This trial suggests that MMC use as a topical adjuvant therapy has no additional benefit in the endoscopic surgical management of LTS.

You Might Also Like

  • Is Mitomycin C Useful as an Adjuvant Therapy in Endoscopic Treatment of Laryngotracheal Stenosis?
  • Smoking History and ANCA Testing Correlate with Nonmechanical LTS
  • Endoscopic Surgical Management of Subglottic Stenosis Still a Challenge
  • Maximum Spirometric Value Changes Predict Surgery Need in Patients with Recurrent Laryngotracheal Stenosis
Explore This Issue
March 2020

Background: Upper airway obstruction caused by LTS often results in severe morbidity and even mortality. LTS treatment continues to present a challenge, employing a wide array of surgical techniques. The high stenosis relapse rate has motivated researchers to find new methods to modulate and control the airway wound-healing process.

Study design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of 15 patients with LTS enrolled in a 24-month trial (August 1, 2012, to February 1, 2018) and randomized into two groups: topical MMC application (n=6) and topical saline application (n=9). 

Setting: University of California–San Francisco Voice and Swallowing Center, Calif.

Synopsis: The primary outcome measurement was duration between surgeries. There were no significant differences between the average time interval between surgeries in MMC and placebo groups. Peak inspiratory flow (PIF) improved following surgery in both groups. Time to maximum PIF improvement was 2.6 months and 2.0 months for placebo and MMC groups, respectively. There was no difference in magnitude of PIF improvement between groups. The percent PIF change from pre-operative values was 64% in the placebo group and 40% in the MMC group. Clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ) scores improved following surgery in both groups. Time to maximum symptom improvement in CCQ score was 2.2 months and 3.1 months for placebo and MMC groups, respectively. There was no difference in magnitude of symptom improvement or duration of symptom improvement between groups. The percent improvement in CCQ score was 73% in the placebo group and 69% in the MMC group. The main limitations were the small number of subjects and some patients’ unwillingness to be randomized. 

Citation: Yung KC, Chang J, Courey MS. A randomized controlled trial of adjuvant mitomycin-C in endoscopic surgery for laryngotracheal stenosis. Laryngoscope. 2020;130:706-711.

Filed Under: Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: treatmentIssue: March 2020

You Might Also Like:

  • Is Mitomycin C Useful as an Adjuvant Therapy in Endoscopic Treatment of Laryngotracheal Stenosis?
  • Smoking History and ANCA Testing Correlate with Nonmechanical LTS
  • Endoscopic Surgical Management of Subglottic Stenosis Still a Challenge
  • Maximum Spirometric Value Changes Predict Surgery Need in Patients with Recurrent Laryngotracheal Stenosis

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you successfully navigated a mid-career change?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • History of the Cochlear Implant

    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
    • Journal Publishing Format Suggestion: A Greener Future for Medical Journals
    • Physician, Know Thyself! Tips for Navigating Mid-Career Transitions in Otolaryngology
    • PA Reform: Is the Administrative War of Attrition Ending?
    • How To: Anatomic-Based Technique for Sensing Lead Placement in Hypoglossal Stimulator Implantation

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939