• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Maximum Spirometric Value Changes Predict Surgery Need in Patients with Recurrent Laryngotracheal Stenosis

by Linda Kossoff • October 19, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What changes occur in spirometric values between surgical interventions in patients with recurrent laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS), and to what degree does tracking those changes help predict the need to return to surgery?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • Remotely Reported Peak Flow Meter Measurements Demonstrate Disease Progression, Predict Need for Surgery in Patients with Subglottal Stenosis
  • Laryngotracheal Stenosis Not Homogenous in Nature
  • Topical Mitomycin-C Offers No Additional Benefit in Surgical LTS Management
  • PNIF Most Reliable Indicator of Nasal Patency
Explore This Issue
October 2021

The deviation from overall spirometric maximums has the strongest predictive power in determining the need to return to surgery.

BACKGROUND: As a relatively rare etiology of a common complaint, LTS presents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Current LTS interventions range from minimally invasive endoscopic techniques to extensive surgeries. To date, attempts to incorporate objective and physiologic measurements to diagnose LTS and guide therapy have had mixed success.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study.

SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, New Orleans, La.

Average Differences in Spirometric Measures Between Preoperative and Post-operative Encounters

Spirometric MeasureAverage Absolute Change ± SD (Relative Change in %)
FEV1*0.40 ± 0.45 (25.9% ± 32.6%)
FIV1*0.51 ± 0.70 (45.7% ± 72.5%)
PEF†1.54 ± 1.18 (74.0% ± 69.6%)
PIF†0.96 ± 0.87 (75.2% ± 71.1%)

*Units for FEV1, FIV1–Liters.

†Units for PEF, PIF–Liters per second.

FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FIV1 = forced inspiratory volume in 1 second; PEF = peak expiratory flow rate; PIF = peak inspiratory flow rate..

SYNOPSIS: Researchers reviewed the charts of 80 patients with a diagnosis of LTS who had undergone spirometric assessment between 2010 and 2019. A total of 77 patients met inclusion criteria. Most were never smokers (n=65) and had a BMI in the overweight to obese range. The researchers tabulated recorded forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced inspiratory volume in 1 second (FIV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF), and peak inspiratory flow (PIF), as well as BMI, and calculated the deviations in spirometric measurements from maximums. Their analysis showed that PEF, PIF, and FIV1 deviations from each patient’s maximums had strong predictive power in determining return to surgery, PIF was the only fixed measurement found to be significant in predicting return to surgery, and BMI did not play a role. The authors say these findings suggest the importance of the amount of change in spirometric values in indicating a need to return to surgery in patients undergoing serial endoscopic incision and dilations in recurrent LTS. Study limitations included its retrospective design and reliance on initial clinical data and decision making.

CITATION: Crosby T, McWhorter A, McDaniel L, et al. Predicting need for surgery in recurrent laryngotracheal stenosis using changes in spirometry. Laryngoscope. 2021;131:2199-2203.

Filed Under: Laryngology, Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: clinical research, treatmentIssue: October 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Remotely Reported Peak Flow Meter Measurements Demonstrate Disease Progression, Predict Need for Surgery in Patients with Subglottal Stenosis
  • Laryngotracheal Stenosis Not Homogenous in Nature
  • Topical Mitomycin-C Offers No Additional Benefit in Surgical LTS Management
  • PNIF Most Reliable Indicator of Nasal Patency

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939