• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Volumetric Changes After CRT for Head and Neck Tumors May Influence Posttreatment Dysphagia

by Amy E. Hamaker • March 11, 2020

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What are the volumetric changes in pharyngeal structures in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with curative chemoradiation therapy (CRT)?

Bottom Line: Volumetric changes following CRT may play a role in post-treatment dysphagia through physiologic function loss from posterior pharynx tissue thickening combined with reduced pharyngeal constriction capacity, and base of tongue atrophy secondary to radiation effects.

You Might Also Like

  • Regular NSAID Use May Improve Survival in Some with Head and Neck Cancer
  • Post-Treatment Persistence of Oral HPV in Head and Neck Cancer Predicts Recurrence, Death
  • Swallowing Therapy During Radiation Helps Prevent Dysphagia
  • Surgeons Describe How They Use Fluorescence to Guide Work on Head and Neck Tumors
Explore This Issue
March 2020

Background: HNSCC has a current incidence rate of 13/100,000. These tumors are highly radiosensitive; treatment with concurrent chemoradiation is the main modality. Radiation-induced fibrosis and dysphagia are major side effects of CRT treatment and lead to weight loss, pneumonia, social isolation, and early death.

Study design: Case series measuring the pre- and one-year post-treatment volumes of the base of tongue (BOT), parapharyngeal spaces (PPS), posterior pharyngeal constrictors (PCs), and retropharyngeal space (RPS) in patients undergoing CRT for HNSCC (n=49) or esophageal carcinoma (EC; n=11) between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015.

Setting: Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Synopsis: Both HNSCC and EC groups lost weight following treatment. Within the HNSCC cohort, 31 tumors were classified as T1 or T2, with four primary unknown tumors. The majority of HNSCC patients had a primary tumor site in the oropharynx, and had p16-positive tumors. Twenty-two primary tumors were located in the tonsil and six were in the BOT. In the HNSCC cohort, PCs volume increased 1.55 cm3, RPS volume increased 1.22 cm3, and BOT volume decreased 2.29 cm3. The EC cohort showed no significant volumetric changes for any anatomic space, with combined PCs and RPS volume changes statistically less than the HNSCC cohort. There were no apparent PPS volumetric changes, indicating tissues surrounding the pharynx have different radiosensitivity and respond to RT to different degrees. Limitations included the possibility of the presence of a synchronous tumor or a primary unknown tumor at BOT that artificially increased volume reduction, the inability to conclude that volumetric changes are associated with functional swallowing impairments, the study’s retrospective nature, a small EC cohort, and lack of data beyond the one-year period.

Citation: Hinther A, Samson N, Lau H, et al. Volumetric changes in pharyngeal structures following head and neck cancer chemoradiation therapy. Laryngoscope. 2020;130:597-602.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Literature Reviews Tagged With: clinical outcomes, head and neck cancerIssue: March 2020

You Might Also Like:

  • Regular NSAID Use May Improve Survival in Some with Head and Neck Cancer
  • Post-Treatment Persistence of Oral HPV in Head and Neck Cancer Predicts Recurrence, Death
  • Swallowing Therapy During Radiation Helps Prevent Dysphagia
  • Surgeons Describe How They Use Fluorescence to Guide Work on Head and Neck Tumors

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939