• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Povidone-Iodine Nasal Spray Does Not Demonstrate Virucidal Activity in COVID-19–Positive Patients

by Linda Kossoff • November 14, 2022

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the effect of povidone-iodine (PVP-I) nasal sprays on nasopharyngeal (NP) viral load as assessed by cycle threshold (Ct) on quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of SARSCoV-2 in outpatients?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • No Correlation Between SARS- CoV-2 Viral Load and Olfactory Psychophysical Scores in COVID-19 Patients
  • No Benefit to Using Povidone-Iodine over Saline as a Nasal Irrigation After Sinonasal Surgery
  • Nasal Lavage May Be a Valid Alternative to Swab Method in SARS-CoV-2 Detection
  • Analyzing Effects of Esketamine Nasal Spray in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression
Explore This Issue
November 2022

Dilute versions of PVP-I nasal spray appear safe for topical use in the nasal cavity, but PVP-I does not demonstrate virucidal activity in COVID-19–positive patients.

BACKGROUND: Studies demonstrate a correlation between SARS-CoV-2 viral load and COVID-19 severity, mortality, and infectivity. SARS-CoV-2 transmission occurs primarily through the spread of aerosolized droplets into the nose. Therefore, direct application of a topical virucidal treatment, such as PVPI, to nasopharyngeal tissues would be expected to decrease viral burden in exposed patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized control trial.

SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers identified 35 outpatients (51.4% female, mean age 43.2 years) with a positive NP swab for COVID- 19 within five days prior to enrollment. Participants were randomized into three treatment groups: 0.9% NaCl (saline [placebo], n=11), 0.5% PVP-I in water (n=11), and 2% PVP-I in water (n=13). After a baseline NP swab, patients received randomized spray bottles and self-administered two sprays per nostril. Additional swabs were collected one hour post-spray, and nine additional treatments were self-administered (two sprays/nostril, 4X/day). Another swab was collected on day three. Symptoms and adverse event questionnaires were completed at baseline, day three, and day five. University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Tests were completed at baseline and day 30. Saline and PVP-I groups both had minimal changes in Ct at the one-hour point. Over time, mean Ct values increased in all groups, indicating declining viral loads. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of changes between placebo and PVP-I groups. All sprays were well tolerated, but the 2.0% PVP-I group reported more nasal burning. Olfaction improved in all groups over 30 days. Study limitations included lack of a negative control group.

CITATION: Zarabanda D, Vukkadala N, Phillips KM, et al. The effect of povidone-iodine nasal spray on nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 viral load: A randomized control trial. Laryngoscope. 2022;132:2089-2095

Filed Under: General Otolaryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: COVID19, treatmentIssue: November 2022

You Might Also Like:

  • No Correlation Between SARS- CoV-2 Viral Load and Olfactory Psychophysical Scores in COVID-19 Patients
  • No Benefit to Using Povidone-Iodine over Saline as a Nasal Irrigation After Sinonasal Surgery
  • Nasal Lavage May Be a Valid Alternative to Swab Method in SARS-CoV-2 Detection
  • Analyzing Effects of Esketamine Nasal Spray in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939