• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Inconsistency in Findings that Intraoperative Electrocochleography Improves Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation

by Scott M. Kelly, Ana H. Kim, MD, and Anil K. Lalwani, MD • January 5, 2024

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

TRIO Best PracticeTRIO Best Practice articles are brief, structured reviews designed to provide the busy clinician with a handy outline and reference for day-to-day clinical decision making. The ENTtoday summaries below include the Background and Best Practice sections of the original article. To view the complete Laryngoscope articles free of charge, visit Laryngoscope.com.

You Might Also Like

  • Choosing the Better- Or Worse-Hearing Ear for Cochlear Implantation
  • Preservation of Residual Hearing after Cochlear Implant Using SMA
  • Choice of Ear for Cochlear Implantation: Implant the Better- or Worse-Hearing Ear?
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
Explore This Issue
December 2023

BACKGROUND

Electrocochleography (ECoG) is a method of measuring electrical potentials produced within the inner ear. ECoG has historically been used for measuring hearing thresholds and identifying endolymphatic hydrops in Ménière’s disease. More recently, the application of ECoG has expanded to monitor electrical potentials during cochlear implantation as an indirect measure of cochlear trauma. In this Best Practice, we examine if intraoperative ECoG improves residual hearing following cochlear implantation.

BEST PRACTICE

There is currently some inconsistency in findings regarding both the correlates of intraoperative ECoG and the efficacy of its implementation. Moreover, some heterogeneity exists in the acquisition and analysis of ECoG. However, the number and quality of observational studies correlating ECoG with objective measures such as pre- and postoperative pure tone average thresholds suggests that ECoG can provide useful information about the functional state of the inner ear during cochlear implant surgery and may predict hearing preservation.

More rigorous research with higher levels of evidence, such as randomized controlled trials, along with the development of a standardized approach to analyzing ECoG is needed to better characterize the effects of implementing intraoperative ECoG in cochlear implant surgery. Currently underway is a multicenter NIH U01 trial (NCT04707885) led by Oliver Adunka, MD, investigating the effects of intraoperative EcoG on residual hearing over 24 months after implantation.    

Filed Under: Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: cochlear implantation, ElectrocochleographyIssue: December 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • Choosing the Better- Or Worse-Hearing Ear for Cochlear Implantation
  • Preservation of Residual Hearing after Cochlear Implant Using SMA
  • Choice of Ear for Cochlear Implantation: Implant the Better- or Worse-Hearing Ear?
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939