• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Preservation of Residual Hearing after Cochlear Implant Using SMA

by Sue Pondrom • August 2, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Is residual hearing preserved after cochlear implantation with the suprameatal approach (SMA) technique? And, is there an alternative analysis to document the conservation of hearing more accurately?

Background: The SMA is the most frequently used implantation technique for cochlear implantation. The SMA has received both criticism and praise since its introduction in 1999, but the question of its appropriateness for preserving residual hearing has never been addressed.

You Might Also Like

  • Hybrid Cochlear Implant Helps Preserve Residual Low-Frequency Hearing
  • Newborn Hearing Screening Affects Age Children Receive Cochlear Implantation
  • Do Perioperative Systemic Corticosteroids Improve Cochlear Implant Hearing Preservation?
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
Explore This Issue
August 2011

Study design: Retrospective chart review.

Setting: Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, The Netherlands; and Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Synopsis: The review included 109 severely to profoundly hearing-impaired cochlear recipients who had some measurable hearing preoperatively. The pre- and postoperative pure-time thresholds were analyzed by three different analyses to observe the degree of hearing preservation. Single-subject results showed a complete conservation of residual hearing in 24.7 percent of patients and partial conservation in 70.6 percent of patients. Group-subject results demonstrated that the median postoperative pure tone average (PTA) was 11.7 dB worse than the preoperative PTA. For individual frequencies, the median deteriorations were 15, 20, 10 and 5 dB at 250, 500, 1,000 and 2,000 Hz, respectively. Stratification for the absence of postoperative hearing thresholds showed a conservation of measurable postoperative hearing levels in 17.4 percent of all study patients.

Bottom line: Complete preservation of residual hearing is possible in a limited number of patients using the SMA for cochlear implantation. For a reliable analysis of the audiometric effects of cochlear implant surgery, the authors said it is important to take into account the ceiling effects, using different calculation methods to estimate the accurate deterioration of hearing thresholds.

Citation: Postelmans JTF, van Spronsen E, Grolman W, et al. An evaluation of preservation of residual hearing using the suprameatal approach for cochlear implantation: Can this implantation technique be used for preservation of residual hearing? Laryngoscope. 2011;121(8):1794-1799.

-Reviewed by Sue Pondrom

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: cochlear implant, residual hearing preserved, SMA, suprameatal approachIssue: August 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • Hybrid Cochlear Implant Helps Preserve Residual Low-Frequency Hearing
  • Newborn Hearing Screening Affects Age Children Receive Cochlear Implantation
  • Do Perioperative Systemic Corticosteroids Improve Cochlear Implant Hearing Preservation?
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939