• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Motion Capture Technology Can Evaluate Extrinsic Laryngeal Muscle Movement Patterns

by Linda Kossoff • January 5, 2024

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

CLINICAL QUESTION

Can motion capture (MoCap) technology distinguish extrinsic laryngeal muscle (ELM) tension and hyperfunction between individuals with and without primary muscle tension dysphonia (pMTD)?

You Might Also Like

  • Nimodipine May Improve Vocal Fold or Facial Motion After Injury
  • Injection Laryngoplasty Helps in Recovery of Vocal Fold Motion
  • Optical Coherence Tomography Offers Noninvasive Way to Visualize Tissues of the Larynx: This emerging technology could improve testing for laryngeal cancers
  • Is Laryngeal Electromyography Useful in the Diagnosis and Management of Vocal Fold Paresis/Paralysis?
Explore This Issue
December 2023

BOTTOM LINE

Results show the feasibility and reliability of MoCap in studying ELM kinematics.

BACKGROUND: Patients with pMTD experience a range of symptoms, including vocal strain and vocal tract discomfort. Some patients complain about the feel of their voice despite a normal sound quality. Although ELM tension and hyperfunction are often implicated as the cause, well-vetted physiological metrics to study ELM tension and hyperfunction are lacking.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.

SETTING: Department of Computer Science, Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers divided 30 participants into two groups: 15 with a formal diagnosis of pMTD and 15 controls. For all participants, 16 markers were placed on different anatomical landmarks on the chin and anterior neck. Movements across these regions were tracked during four voice and speech tasks using two three-dimensional cameras. Movement displacement and variability were determined based on 16 key points and 53 edges. Twelve videos were obtained for each participant. Significance of ELM edge movement displacement and variability across the 53 edges between groups for each of the tasks were statistically analyzed. The findings showed more movement variability but similar movement displacements across the 53 edges in the pMTD group as compared with the control group, and greater movement displacement in the thyrohyoid space in the pMTD group. Results demonstrated the feasibility and strong reliability of MoCap as a method to study ELM movement patterns. Intra- and inter-reliability measures were strong, and there were movement patterns using MoCap that could differentiate between groups with and without pMTD. Study limitations included the limits of MoCap itself, given variations in neck skin characteristics such as edema and scarring.

CITATION: Hogue S, Guo X, Morrison RA, et al. Use of motion capture technology to study extrinsic laryngeal muscle tension and hyperfunction. Laryngoscope. 2023;133:3472–3481.

Filed Under: Laryngology, Laryngology, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Tagged With: extrinsic laryngeal muscle kinematics, motion capture technologyIssue: December 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • Nimodipine May Improve Vocal Fold or Facial Motion After Injury
  • Injection Laryngoplasty Helps in Recovery of Vocal Fold Motion
  • Optical Coherence Tomography Offers Noninvasive Way to Visualize Tissues of the Larynx: This emerging technology could improve testing for laryngeal cancers
  • Is Laryngeal Electromyography Useful in the Diagnosis and Management of Vocal Fold Paresis/Paralysis?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Cochlear Implants Improve Performance and Net Savings in Infants
    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939