• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

CMS’ New Rule Aims to Streamline the Prior Authorization Process

by Karen Appold • December 2, 2025

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Otolaryngology Practices Use Digital Tools to Pre-authorize—With Mixed Results
  • A Look at How the AMA Supports Members and Otolaryngologists at Large
  • Do Prior Authorization Requests Hurt Patient Care?
  • Countdown to ICD-10 Winds Down as October 1 Start Date Approaches
Explore This Issue
December 2025

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ Interoperability and Prior Authorization Final Rule (https://tinyurl.com/sy2sbhv6), which aims to improve the prior authorization process through policies and technology, takes effect January 1, 2026.

The new rule, which was released in January 2024, is expected to benefit providers and patients while bringing new requirements for payers. Payers will need to send prior authorization decisions within 72 hours for expedited (i.e., urgent) requests and seven calendar days for standard (i.e., nonurgent) requests. Payers will have to provide a specific reason for a denied prior authorization decision.

“The new rule provides much-needed change for otolaryngologists and their patients,” said Gene Brown, MD, otolaryngologist, president, and CEO of Charleston ENT & Allergy in Charleston, S.C. “For physicians, the prior authorization process will be streamlined, electronic, and much more transparent because reasons for denials will be required. For patients, wait times for prior authorization will be reduced.”

The regulation falls short in several critical areas, however, Dr. Brown said. Most notably, the rule’s timeframe requirements, while improved, remain inadequate. Healthcare advocates pushed for 24-hour decisions for expedited prior authorizations and 72-hour turnarounds for routine requests.

Additionally, the rule doesn’t affect the prior authorization processes for Medicare Part B or Part D drugs (e.g., prescription drugs that may be self-administered, administered by a provider, or dispensed or administered in a pharmacy or hospital). “This carve-out is significant because Part B drugs are often subjected to stringent prior authorization and step therapy protocols,” said Harry DeCabo, director of advocacy for the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery in Alexandria, Va.

Yolanda Troublefield, MD, JD, an attending otolaryngologist at Southcoast Physicians Group in Dartmouth, Mass., and a clinical instructor of surgery at Brown School of Medicine in Providence, R.I., also has concerns about CMS’s new rule.

“On the one hand, insurers are asking us to maximize medical management and treatment of diseases prior to surgical intervention, and on the other hand, no structures are in place in order to get Part B medications approved in a timely fashion,” she said.

Starting in 2027, CMS’s new rule will place new requirements on providers who participate in the Medicare Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). The rule creates a new measure, titled “electronic prior authorization,” regarding the Health Information Exchange objective for the MIPS Promoting Interoperability performance category and the Medicare Promoting Interoperability Program. “This will place more administrative burdens on physicians without meaningfully improving patient care or access,” Mr. DeCabo said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Filed Under: Business of Medicine, Features, Health Policy, Home Slider Tagged With: CMS' New RuleIssue: December 2025

You Might Also Like:

  • Otolaryngology Practices Use Digital Tools to Pre-authorize—With Mixed Results
  • A Look at How the AMA Supports Members and Otolaryngologists at Large
  • Do Prior Authorization Requests Hurt Patient Care?
  • Countdown to ICD-10 Winds Down as October 1 Start Date Approaches

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Has your practice or department been affected by the lack of anesthesiologists?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • A Letter to My Younger Self: Making Deliberate Changes Can Help Improve the Sense of Belonging
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
    • Bottleneck In the OR: How Anesthesiologist Shortages Threaten Surgical Care
    • Onboarding and Working with APPs
    • Evaluating Treatment Patterns in Bell’s Palsy Using Nationwide Employer- Sponsored Healthcare Claims
    • Randomized Trials Comparing Inferior Turbinoplasty Techniques for Nasal Obstruction

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939