• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

30-Unit Dose of Abobotulinum Toxin A Reduces Most Nasal Allergic Rhinitis Symptoms

by Linda Kossoff • January 15, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the lowest effective dose of abobotulinum toxin A injection for allergic rhinitis?

BOTTOM LINE: Abobotulinum toxin A at a dose of at least 30 U effectively reduces most nasal symptoms.

You Might Also Like

  • Is Posterior Nasal Nerve Ablation Effective in Treating Symptoms of Allergic Rhinitis?
  • Local Nasal Immunotherapy Safe, Effective for Allergic Rhinitis
  • Treating Allergic Rhinitis Improves Symptoms of ADHD
  • Two Techniques Compared for Laryngeal Botulinum Toxin Injection
Explore This Issue
January 2021

BACKGROUND: Used to treat allergic rhinitis since 1998, botulinum toxin A is formulated in three, noninterchangeable types: onabotulinum toxin A, abobotulinum toxin A, and incobotulinum toxin A. There is no standard recommended dose of botulinum toxin for allergic rhinitis; however, exceeding the minimum effective dose increases side effect risk.

STUDY DESIGN: Dose-escalation randomized controlled trial.

SETTING: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers randomly allocated doses of abobotulinum toxin A to 17 patients who had persistent allergic rhinitis and positive allergy skin prick tests. Seven patients received an injected dose of 20 U of abobotulinum toxin A, five patients received 30 U, and another five received 40 U. The total dose for each arm was divided at a 50:50 ratio and injected over five minutes into the anterior part of the inferior turbinate on each side under a rigid endoscope. Follow-up lasted three months, with outpatient evaluations or telephone interviews conducted at weeks one, two, four, eight, and 12. A five-point Likert scale was used to evaluate nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal itching, inhibited sense of smell, and eye itching, redness, and watering. Objective outcomes included findings from nasal endoscopy and acoustic rhinometry. Results showed that abobotulinum toxin A significantly improved nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and loss of smell at 40 U, and nasal congestion, sneezing, and loss of smell at 30 U, but at the 20 U dose, only nasal congestion and loss of smell improved.

CITATION: Piromchai P, Pornumnouy W, Saeseow P, et al. The minimum effective dose of abobotulinum toxin A injection for allergic rhinitis: A dose-escalation randomized controlled trial [published online ahead of print December 8, 2020]. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. doi: 10.1002/lio2.499.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Rhinology, Rhinology Tagged With: rhinitis, treatmentIssue: January 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Is Posterior Nasal Nerve Ablation Effective in Treating Symptoms of Allergic Rhinitis?
  • Local Nasal Immunotherapy Safe, Effective for Allergic Rhinitis
  • Treating Allergic Rhinitis Improves Symptoms of ADHD
  • Two Techniques Compared for Laryngeal Botulinum Toxin Injection

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939