ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Alternative Payment Model Promises More Penalty Than Pay

by Thomas Collins • November 5, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Pixelbliss/SHUTTERSTOCK.com

Image Credit: Pixelbliss/SHUTTERSTOCK.com

Otolaryngologists and doctors across the country are being doused in an alphabet soup of new payment models and concepts, swimming through terms like CPIA, ACO, and MACRA.

You Might Also Like

No related posts.

Explore This Issue
November 2015

One of the most important acronyms in the soup is MIPS, or Merit-Based Incentive Payment System. In the federal legislation that forever abolished the reviled sustainable growth rate (SGR) reimbursement formula, the MIPS, a new pay-for-performance program, was born.

The new financial realities hitting healthcare were discussed in a session on new payment models at the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery’s Annual Meeting.

Under the MIPS, Medicare reimbursement for physicians will be a function of quality determined by the so-called Value-Based Payment Modifier (VBM) and the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), along with resource use determined by the VBM, meaningful use of electronic health records (EHR-MU), and clinical practice improvement activities (CPIA).

Potentially big swings of reimbursement money are possible, said Robert Lorenz, MD, MBA, who co-chairs the American Academy of Otolaryngology’s Ad Hoc Payment Model Workgroup with Jane Dillon, MD, MBA. “You’ll see either an additional revenue of 4% to 9%, or a penalty of 4% to 9%, so [it is] a significant change in CMS funding over time,” he said.

But centers that participate in certain alternative payment models (APM) can opt out of the MIPS. “The problem is, we don’t know much about what CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] has in store for us with the alternative payment model,” Dr. Lorenz said. Centers using APMs will be required to take financial risk, use quality measures that are equivalent to those in the MIPS, and use an EHR.

Who Pays Out of Pocket for Medical Care?

Two nontraditional payment models were discussed in the session. In one, used by a group in Georgia, patients pay a flat fee for a whole package of care. The other, an “episode of care” model used in Arkansas, is a system in which physicians can be rewarded or penalized based on how their expenses compare to an average.

The first model, used for the past two years at Northwest ENT and Allergy Center in the Atlanta area, is designed to appeal to the uninsured and those with high deductibles.

Drew Locandro, MD, president of the center, called it “the most pure payment system ever devised.” Patients pay a guaranteed cash price for all of the care required for a certain procedure: the office consultation, in-office testing, surgeon fees, anesthesiologist services, facility services and supplies, and pathology lab fees. The cash package option is available for the most common ENT procedures, including tonsillectomy, septoplasty, and ear tubes.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features Tagged With: AAO-HNS 2015, alternative payment model, APM, Medicare, Merit-Based Incentive Payment System, MIPS, reimbursement, SGR, sustainable growth rateIssue: November 2015

You Might Also Like:

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Why We Get Colds
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Some Challenges Remain to Having a Universal Resident Leave Policy, But Otolaryngology Programs Are Getting Closer
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Neurogenic Cough Is Often a Diagnosis of Exclusion
    • Why We Get Colds
    • Are the Jobs in Healthcare Good Jobs?
    • What Really Works in Functional Rhinoplasty?
    • Is the Best Modality to Assess Vocal Fold Mobility in Children Flexible Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy or Ultrasound?
    • Three Primary Treatment Strategies Show No Differences in Swallow Outcome for Patients with Low- to Intermediate-Risk Tonsil Cancer

Polls

Do you have physician assistants in your otolaryngology practice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2023 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939