• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Alternative Payment Model Promises More Penalty Than Pay

by Thomas Collins • November 5, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Pixelbliss/SHUTTERSTOCK.com

Image Credit: Pixelbliss/SHUTTERSTOCK.com

Otolaryngologists and doctors across the country are being doused in an alphabet soup of new payment models and concepts, swimming through terms like CPIA, ACO, and MACRA.

You Might Also Like

  • HHS Network to Facilitate Transition to Alternative Payment Models
  • Is the Fee-for-Service Physician Payment Model Doomed?
  • Payment Limbo: Medical societies take on SGR reform
  • When Dealing with Insurers, Electronic Payment Tools May be an Otolaryngologist’s Best Friend
Explore This Issue
November 2015

One of the most important acronyms in the soup is MIPS, or Merit-Based Incentive Payment System. In the federal legislation that forever abolished the reviled sustainable growth rate (SGR) reimbursement formula, the MIPS, a new pay-for-performance program, was born.

The new financial realities hitting healthcare were discussed in a session on new payment models at the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery’s Annual Meeting.

Under the MIPS, Medicare reimbursement for physicians will be a function of quality determined by the so-called Value-Based Payment Modifier (VBM) and the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS), along with resource use determined by the VBM, meaningful use of electronic health records (EHR-MU), and clinical practice improvement activities (CPIA).

Potentially big swings of reimbursement money are possible, said Robert Lorenz, MD, MBA, who co-chairs the American Academy of Otolaryngology’s Ad Hoc Payment Model Workgroup with Jane Dillon, MD, MBA. “You’ll see either an additional revenue of 4% to 9%, or a penalty of 4% to 9%, so [it is] a significant change in CMS funding over time,” he said.

But centers that participate in certain alternative payment models (APM) can opt out of the MIPS. “The problem is, we don’t know much about what CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] has in store for us with the alternative payment model,” Dr. Lorenz said. Centers using APMs will be required to take financial risk, use quality measures that are equivalent to those in the MIPS, and use an EHR.

Who Pays Out of Pocket for Medical Care?

Two nontraditional payment models were discussed in the session. In one, used by a group in Georgia, patients pay a flat fee for a whole package of care. The other, an “episode of care” model used in Arkansas, is a system in which physicians can be rewarded or penalized based on how their expenses compare to an average.

The first model, used for the past two years at Northwest ENT and Allergy Center in the Atlanta area, is designed to appeal to the uninsured and those with high deductibles.

Drew Locandro, MD, president of the center, called it “the most pure payment system ever devised.” Patients pay a guaranteed cash price for all of the care required for a certain procedure: the office consultation, in-office testing, surgeon fees, anesthesiologist services, facility services and supplies, and pathology lab fees. The cash package option is available for the most common ENT procedures, including tonsillectomy, septoplasty, and ear tubes.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features Tagged With: AAO-HNS 2015, alternative payment model, APM, Medicare, Merit-Based Incentive Payment System, MIPS, reimbursement, SGR, sustainable growth rateIssue: November 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • HHS Network to Facilitate Transition to Alternative Payment Models
  • Is the Fee-for-Service Physician Payment Model Doomed?
  • Payment Limbo: Medical societies take on SGR reform
  • When Dealing with Insurers, Electronic Payment Tools May be an Otolaryngologist’s Best Friend

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939