• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

AMA Manual Updates Guidance on Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Medical and Science Journals

by Linda Kossoff • May 17, 2022

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What can be done to encourage fairness, equity, consistency, and clarity in use and reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • Consideration of Race, Ethnicity and Ancestry
  • Do Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status Impact Cancer Follow-Up Care?
  • AAO-HNS Updates Guidance on Ménière’s Disease Diagnosis, Treatment
  • AMA Expands Educational Resources to Advance Equity and Justice in Healthcare
Explore This Issue
May 2022

Language and terminology must be accurate, clear, and precise, and must reflect fairness, equity, and consistency in use and reporting of race and ethnicity.

BACKGROUND: In 2021, the AMA Manual of Style Committee released guidelines in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) for the reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals. The guidance has since been updated and will appear in the manual’s Inclusive Language section.

COMMENT: This editorial provides recommendations and suggestions to “encourage fairness, equity, consistency, and clarity in use and reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals.” The authors support the contention that race and ethnicity are social constructs with limited utility in understanding medical research, practice, or policy; however, the terms can be useful “as a lens through which to study and view racism and disparities and inequities in health, health care, and medical practice, education, and research.” This updated guidance will be added to the Inclusive Language section (Section 11.12) of the AMA Manual of Style as a dedicated subsection on Race and Ethnicity (Section 11.12.3). There are additional subsections that address reporting concerns and preferred nomenclature for sex and gender, sexual orientation, age, socioeconomic status, and persons with diseases, disorders, or disabilities. Inclusive language supports diversity and conveys respect, and these resources should be used to guide our future clinical, educational, and research practices in otolaryngology. —Sarah Bowe, MD

STUDY DESIGN: Editorial.

SETTING: American Medical Association, Chicago, Ill.

SYNOPSIS: Responding to feedback on their suggested guidelines, the updated guidance is based on the contention that race and ethnicity are social constructs with limited utility in understanding medical research, practice, or policy. The authors emphasized the need for medical journal content to be accurate, clear, and precise in language and terminology, and reflective of fairness, equity, and consistency in the use and reporting of race and ethnicity. The guidance defines commonly used terms and acknowledges the changing nature of certain terms and definitions. Among the relevant items: concerns and controversies addressed in healthcare and heritage; social determinants of health; additional socioeconomic, structural, institutional, cultural, and demographic factors; reporting of race and ethnicity in research articles; use of racial and ethnic collective or umbrella terms (such as “minorities” and “multiethnic”); definitions of terms; key concerns, sensitivities, and controversies; demographics reporting; and specifics regarding usage of forms of speech and capitalizations. Key goals of the guidance are to reduce unintentional bias in literature and provide context when reporting on racial and ethnic disparities and inequities.

CITATION: Flanagin A, Frey T, Christiansen SL. Updated guidance on the reporting of race and ethnicity in medical and science journals. JAMA. 2021;326:621-627

Pages: 1 2 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Literature Reviews Tagged With: clinical research, diversityIssue: May 2022

You Might Also Like:

  • Consideration of Race, Ethnicity and Ancestry
  • Do Race, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status Impact Cancer Follow-Up Care?
  • AAO-HNS Updates Guidance on Ménière’s Disease Diagnosis, Treatment
  • AMA Expands Educational Resources to Advance Equity and Justice in Healthcare

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Shifting the Treatment Goalpost Toward Medical Management of Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939