• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

AMA’s Opt-Out Provision for Sale of Physician Prescribing Data Seen as First Step

by Terry Hartnett • August 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

AMA contends the PDRP program will allow the practice of selling drug prescribing data only for those physicians who have no objections. However, it is not just the AMA member physicians who reject the selling of their practice information. State legislators in four states have introduced legislation to ban the practice entirely, a move that the AMA is strongly against. In New Hampshire, House Bill 1346 was approved unanimously by the State Senate after similar approval by the State House and was signed by the Governor June 30. It became effective immediately. The bill allows for the use of prescribing data for research and public health purposes, but bans the use for marketing purposes (see highlights from the bill text, right).

You Might Also Like

  • Drug Marketing: Different Impacts on Different Physicians
  • Report: Physician Prescribing Behavior Changes Following Restrictions on Direct Marketing
  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence
  • EMR and Advertising: Strange Bedfellows?
Explore This Issue
August 2006

But Dr. Wetmore said the AMA’s opt-out program may not be enough. Providing an opt-out provision is insufficient if we are not informed of the use of the pharmacy data, he said. Dr. Wetmore wishes the West Virginia legislature had acted on that state’s proposed bill that died in committee. I am sorry that the law to protect the privacy of this information did not pass the West Virginia Legislature this past year. It is an invasion of my privacy if drug companies or drug benefit managers use prescribing information, even if patient identifiers are not included, he added.

Privacy First

Physician support for changes in the law and for the new program ultimately comes down to privacy. I am not a big prescriber of drugs in my practice, but I totally agree that what I do in this regard as an otolaryngologist should be private, said Phillip Daspit, MD, an otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeon in Phoenix, Ariz. I should definitely have the ability to tell a drug company that they have no right to know what drugs I prescribe in my practice, he said. Dr. Daspit supports a bill introduced in the Arizona legislature earlier this year. That bill, HB 2800 that failed to be voted out of committee, would make the release or sale of confidential prescription information an act of unprofessional conduct. Likewise, Dr. Daspit said he intends to sign up for the AMA opt-out program even though his information is limited.

I feel that it is an invasion of privacy to allow pharmaceutical companies to use doctor’s prescribing information. This information should not be sold or made available to pharmacy benefit management companies. – -Stephen Wetmore, MD, MBA

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Everyday Ethics, Health Policy, Practice Management Tagged With: Ethics, healthcare reform, legal, medication, patient education, patient safety, pharmaceuticals, physician safety, policy, privacy, reimbursementIssue: August 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Drug Marketing: Different Impacts on Different Physicians
  • Report: Physician Prescribing Behavior Changes Following Restrictions on Direct Marketing
  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence
  • EMR and Advertising: Strange Bedfellows?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939