• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Are Post-Operative Hearing Results Better with Titanium Ossicular Reconstruction Prostheses?

by Daniel M. Zeitler, MD, and Anil K. Lalwani, MD • December 1, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Trio Best PracticeBackground

Over the past half century, a variety of different materials have been used to design the ideal middle ear prosthesis and improve post-operative hearing results. Although autologous ossicles are an ideal option, their use is often precluded due to the underlying disease process. This spurred the development of prostheses made from inert biologic and synthetic materials, which allows for precise placement by the surgeon, maximizes sound transfer and provides sufficient rigidity to maintain long-term positioning and outcome. A variety of synthetic materials have been used, including polymers, bioceramics, hydroxyapatite (HA) and, most recently, titanium. Do the low weight, high rigidity and delicately engineered design of titanium prosthesis lead to superior hearing results?

You Might Also Like

  • Flexible Ossicular Reconstruction Prosthesis Allows for Ease of Placement in Temporal Bone
  • Studies Examine Semicircular Canal Dehiscence, Stapedectomy Prostheses.
  • How To: Reconstruction of Anterior Table Frontal Sinus Defects with Pericranial Flap and Titanium Mesh
  • New, Conforming, Easy-to-Use Materials Characterize Developments in Middle Ear Reconstruction
Explore This Issue
December 2012

Best Practice

Titanium prostheses are safe and provide excellent functional results in patients undergoing ossiculoplasty for chronic ear disease. However, the hearing results are similar to reconstruction with other materials such as HA and incus interposition reconstruction. Therefore, each patient should have an individualized assessment, both pre-operatively and intra-operatively, and the mechanical and/or anatomic conditions should be considered in choosing a reconstruction method. Read the full article in The Laryngoscope.

Filed Under: Departments, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: chronic ear disease, hearing loss, outcomes, prostheses, surgeryIssue: December 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • Flexible Ossicular Reconstruction Prosthesis Allows for Ease of Placement in Temporal Bone
  • Studies Examine Semicircular Canal Dehiscence, Stapedectomy Prostheses.
  • How To: Reconstruction of Anterior Table Frontal Sinus Defects with Pericranial Flap and Titanium Mesh
  • New, Conforming, Easy-to-Use Materials Characterize Developments in Middle Ear Reconstruction

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939