• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Are Post-Operative Hearing Results Better with Titanium Ossicular Reconstruction Prostheses?

by Daniel M. Zeitler, MD, and Anil K. Lalwani, MD • December 1, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Trio Best PracticeBackground

Over the past half century, a variety of different materials have been used to design the ideal middle ear prosthesis and improve post-operative hearing results. Although autologous ossicles are an ideal option, their use is often precluded due to the underlying disease process. This spurred the development of prostheses made from inert biologic and synthetic materials, which allows for precise placement by the surgeon, maximizes sound transfer and provides sufficient rigidity to maintain long-term positioning and outcome. A variety of synthetic materials have been used, including polymers, bioceramics, hydroxyapatite (HA) and, most recently, titanium. Do the low weight, high rigidity and delicately engineered design of titanium prosthesis lead to superior hearing results?

You Might Also Like

  • Flexible Ossicular Reconstruction Prosthesis Allows for Ease of Placement in Temporal Bone
  • Studies Examine Semicircular Canal Dehiscence, Stapedectomy Prostheses.
  • How To: Reconstruction of Anterior Table Frontal Sinus Defects with Pericranial Flap and Titanium Mesh
  • New, Conforming, Easy-to-Use Materials Characterize Developments in Middle Ear Reconstruction
Explore This Issue
December 2012

Best Practice

Titanium prostheses are safe and provide excellent functional results in patients undergoing ossiculoplasty for chronic ear disease. However, the hearing results are similar to reconstruction with other materials such as HA and incus interposition reconstruction. Therefore, each patient should have an individualized assessment, both pre-operatively and intra-operatively, and the mechanical and/or anatomic conditions should be considered in choosing a reconstruction method. Read the full article in The Laryngoscope.

Filed Under: Departments, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: chronic ear disease, hearing loss, outcomes, prostheses, surgeryIssue: December 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • Flexible Ossicular Reconstruction Prosthesis Allows for Ease of Placement in Temporal Bone
  • Studies Examine Semicircular Canal Dehiscence, Stapedectomy Prostheses.
  • How To: Reconstruction of Anterior Table Frontal Sinus Defects with Pericranial Flap and Titanium Mesh
  • New, Conforming, Easy-to-Use Materials Characterize Developments in Middle Ear Reconstruction

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you participated in any leadership training to further your career?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Otolaryngology Hospitalists: A Relatively New Role
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Otolaryngology Hospitalists: A Relatively New Role
    • Feeling the Squeeze
    • Patient and Procedural Predictors of Early Recovery Quality after Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery
    • What’s New Versus Tried and True in Pulsatile Tinnitus
    • The Impact of Chronic Particulate Matter Exposure on Quality-of-Life Outcomes after ESS

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939