• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Are Simulated or 3D-Printed Temporal Bones as Useful for Training as Cadaveric Bones?

by Alan G. Micco, MD • October 3, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

TRIO Best PracticeTRIO Best Practice articles are brief, structured reviews designed to provide the busy clinician with a handy outline and reference for day-to-day clinical decision making. The ENTtoday summaries below include the Background and Best Practice sections of the original article. To view the complete Laryngoscope articles free of charge, visit Laryngoscope.com.

You Might Also Like

  • VR Simulator Training Improves Cadaveric Temporal Bone Dissection
  • Hi-Fidelity VR/3D Models Can Aid in Temporal Bone Surgery Practice
  • Temporal Bone Metastasis Should Be Considered in Certain Symptomatic Patients
  • Are Cochlear Implants a Viable Option Following Temporal Bone Fracture?
Explore This Issue
September 2023

BACKGROUND

Temporal bone dissection laboratories using cadaveric temporal bone have been the gold standard for otologic training. Maintaining the requirements for this type of laboratory course is not trivial. Recently, training programs have been challenged by limited access to cadaveric bones, limited laboratory space, and increased costs.

A potential solution for these issues has been the use of virtual or three-dimensional (3D)-printed temporal bones to simulate the drilling exercise and provide specimens to teach anatomy and procedures. This Best Practice looks at whether these models are successful in training participants to safely perform otologic procedures in the operating room.

BEST PRACTICE

Cadaveric temporal bones remain the gold standard for otologic anatomy and surgical training. The current literature supports the use of virtual or 3D-printed temporal bones, particularly as adjuncts or preparatory exercises prior to actual drilling. The 3D-printed temporal bones appear to be a better substitute than virtual exercises.

Further refinements of the virtual and 3D-printed bones are on the horizon and are needed because they may become the only source for some residents and practitioners to practice temporal bone surgery.

Filed Under: Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: head and neck surgery, physician trainingIssue: September 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • VR Simulator Training Improves Cadaveric Temporal Bone Dissection
  • Hi-Fidelity VR/3D Models Can Aid in Temporal Bone Surgery Practice
  • Temporal Bone Metastasis Should Be Considered in Certain Symptomatic Patients
  • Are Cochlear Implants a Viable Option Following Temporal Bone Fracture?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you participated in any leadership training to further your career?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Signaling in Otolaryngology Resident Matching
    • Otolaryngology Hospitalists: A Relatively New Role
    • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Otolaryngology Hospitalists: A Relatively New Role
    • Feeling the Squeeze
    • Patient and Procedural Predictors of Early Recovery Quality after Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery
    • What’s New Versus Tried and True in Pulsatile Tinnitus
    • The Impact of Chronic Particulate Matter Exposure on Quality-of-Life Outcomes after ESS

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939