ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Benefits, Drawbacks of Free Abdominal Fat Transfer for Parotidectomy Defect Reconstruction

by Amy E. Hamaker • August 10, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Other complications reported included the following:

You Might Also Like

No related posts.

Explore This Issue
August 2016
  • Parotidectomy wound dehiscence occurred in six cases (6%); all of these patients responded to conservative management.
  • Fat transfer graft debulking was required in three patients with persistent overcorrection beyond six months postoperatively. According to Dr. Gourin, one patient lost a great deal of weight, and two patients did not have the absorption rate originally predicted. No patients demonstrated undercorrection or further FAT resorption beyond six months.
  • There were no significant differences between the FAT and control groups with respect to postoperative drain output, duration of drainage, and facial nerve function.
  • Although Frey’s syndrome can also occur, no patients in this study reported the condition or required Botox injections for it.

Contraindications

Gustatory sweating during starch-iodine test following parotidectomy.

Gustatory sweating during starch-iodine test following parotidectomy.
U.S. National Library of Medicine

Dr. Gourin noted that, based on her experience since her last study on the FAT graft technique in 2008, she has found some contraindications for its use (Laryngoscope. 2008;118:1186-1190). “If you’re excising skin along with the parotid gland, then the closure is under increased tension and the FAT graft will further increase that tension. In that case, I wouldn’t consider doing one.”

Although the FAT procedure is a technically simple reconstructive option when performing parotidectomy, it isn’t as commonly used as SMC flaps. “Only perhaps half of parotid surgeons perform it, and I think its use depends to some extent on the age of the surgeon and where he or she trained,” said Dr. Gourin. “It wasn’t something I learned to do in my training; many of us just weren’t exposed to techniques for parotid defect reconstruction.

“It also depends on whether you view a parotid defect as a cosmetic problem and how much you discuss it pre-surgery with patients,” she added. “Many patients don’t ask about reconstruction because they don’t expect a defect. I offer it during consultation because after a parotidectomy and the shock of the tumor wears off, other concerns like appearance often come to the front. It isn’t vanity—it’s returning to the state they were in before the operation. I’d love to see this technique in greater use. If I ever had a parotid tumor, I would want this done.”


Amy E. Hamaker is a freelance medical writer based in California.

Key Points

  • There are a number of surgical techniques for reconstructing this parotidectomy defect, including bipedicled sternocleidomastoid muscle flaps, AlloDerm biomaterial, free tissue transfer, and free abdominal fat transfer.
  • Autologous fat grafts have long been used in the reconstruction of facial defects, and the advantages of utilizing fat include its abundant availability, biocompatibility, and ease of harvest.
  • The main criticism of fat grafting has been reabsorption and longevity of the material.

Preventing Frey’s Syndrome

Frey’s syndrome, or gustatory sweating, is a known complication of parotid gland surgery. Placing a barrier between the overlying skin flap and the parotid bed during repair can often prevent the syndrome. A recent study published in The Laryngoscope examined how effective FAT grafts are for preventing Frey’s syndrome (Laryngoscope. 2016;126:815-819).

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Home Slider, Practice Focus, Special Reports Tagged With: facial reconstruction, FAT tranfer, free abdomical fat transfer, parotidectomyIssue: August 2016

You Might Also Like:

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Neurogenic Cough Is Often a Diagnosis of Exclusion
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Neurogenic Cough Is Often a Diagnosis of Exclusion
    • Why We Get Colds
    • Are the Jobs in Healthcare Good Jobs?
    • What Really Works in Functional Rhinoplasty?
    • Is the Best Modality to Assess Vocal Fold Mobility in Children Flexible Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy or Ultrasound?
    • Three Primary Treatment Strategies Show No Differences in Swallow Outcome for Patients with Low- to Intermediate-Risk Tonsil Cancer

Polls

Do you have physician assistants in your otolaryngology practice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2023 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939