• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Biologics for Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyposis

by Elizabeth Hofheinz, MPH, MEd • June 9, 2019

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

I believe that these new biologics will have an extremely important role in the management of chronic sinusitis with and without NP, but this is a process and we must temper our exuberance. —Timothy L. Smith, MD, MPH

You Might Also Like

  • Are New Biologics a Game Changer for Treating Nasal Polyposis?
  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Superior to Two of Three Biologics in Treating Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps
  • Do Preoperative Corticosteroids Benefit Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis?
  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know about Biologics and Allergic Rhinitis
Explore This Issue
June 2019

Another study endpoint was the sense of smell, which patients rated as more important than congestion. “In our study,” said Dr. Han, “patients whose sense of smell had disappeared were actually able to regain it,  [which is] remarkable and vital to the quality of their lives.”

He thinks biologics will be effective for the management of nasal polyps but added that it’s unclear where within the range of available treatments they will fall.

Bias and Clinical Relevance

Timothy L. Smith, MD, MPH, vice chair of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery and professor of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery in the division of rhinology and sinus/skull base surgery at Oregon Health and Science University in Portland, said he has reservations about biologics.

First, he said, there is the risk of bias assessment. One systematic review looking at the potential for bias in biologics research found “encouraging” results, he said, but added that there there were indeed biases present and a high risk of bias for attrition and reporting, in particular (Rhinology. 2018;56:11–21).

“I sometimes question the clinical relevance of the outcomes in these studies,” Dr. Smith said. He referenced a 2017 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that assessed the need for surgery; 105 patients received mepolizumab (n = 54) or placebo (n = 51) (J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140:1024–1031). At the outset, 100% of patients needed surgery; by week 25 the mepolizumab group dropped to 70% and the control dropped to 90%. “That is not statistically significant until you do a post hoc analysis,” he added. “I think it is telling that after six months of expensive therapy, a full 70% [of participants] still needed sinus surgery.”

Regarding the visual analog scale (VAS) scores for NPs, the investigators did find a statistically significant improvement in nasal polyposis severity, but, asked Dr. Smith, “how important to the patient is being at 6.5 versus 5 after six months of expensive, systemic therapy?”

He added that one global issue is that nearly all studies involve some sort of relationship with a pharmaceutical company, with recent larger studies demonstrating multiple potential conflicts of interest.

“Looking back, it seems that we have been down this road before,” said Dr. Smith. “A study published in 2001 looking at montelukast resulted in tremendous hype about using it for NP (J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108:466–467). But reflect on how it figures in our current practice … in my practice it is virtually irrelevant. I believe that these new biologics will have an extremely important role in the management of chronic sinusitis with and without NP, but this is a process and we must temper our exuberance.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Practice Focus, Rhinology Tagged With: biologic therapies, chronic rhinosinusitus, Nasal polyposis, nasal polyps, Triological Society Annual Meeting 2019Issue: June 2019

You Might Also Like:

  • Are New Biologics a Game Changer for Treating Nasal Polyposis?
  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Superior to Two of Three Biologics in Treating Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps
  • Do Preoperative Corticosteroids Benefit Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis?
  • What Otolaryngologists Need to Know about Biologics and Allergic Rhinitis

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939