• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Breaking Down the New Guidelines on Cochlear Implants for Pediatric Single-Sided Deafness

by Nikki Kean • August 16, 2022

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

As for which imaging modality is best for screening children, part of that calculus involves the etiology of SSD, which is often more complex than that for children with bilateral hearing loss. Therefore, screening candidates for CI is vitally important, especially to rule out cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) or eighth nerve hypoplasia. Cochlear nerve deficiency is a contraindication for CI and is reported to occur in 46% in children with SSD (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149:318-325). “We want to rule out CND before we even consider children for candidacy,” Dr. Park said.

You Might Also Like

  • Benefits of Cochlear Implants in Single-Sided Deafness Patients
  • Genetic Testing Is Appropriate for Some Pediatric Patients with Unilateral Hearing Loss or Single-Sided Deafness
  • How to Help Patients With Single-Sided Deafness Relearn Music
  • Psychosocial Aspects of Single-Sided Deafness Important to Consider in Patient Care
Explore This Issue
August 2022

The best way to screen patients for CND is with high-resolution 3D magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), noted Dr. Young. “It’s important to know that computer tomography will not identify a significant subset of ears with CND, nor does the presence of residual hearing exclude CND,” said Dr. Young. “I felt that, as a physician on the task force, it was a very important message that high-resolution MRI be done to avoid CND-related poor outcomes. At present there is no evidence that binaural hearing benefits will occur in this SSD population.”

For patients with meningitis, “MRI is also the most sensitive modality for identifying patency problems inside the inner ear,” Dr. Young added. “If the child’s MRI shows early signs of obstruction, that’s a reason to go ahead with CI as soon as possible,” she said.

Optimal Age: The Earlier the Better

There’s another challenge: FDA approval parameters may be too narrow. Most experts agree that the optimal age of implant should be the same as the one for bilateral congenital deafness. However, the current FDA indications for SSD specify that candidates have a maximum duration of deafness of 10 years and minimum age of 5 years.

“I tip my hat to the FDA for including children in the SSD indications developed in response to an adult clinical trial,” Dr. Young said. “However, based on 30-plus years of data and experience in implantation of children with bilateral deafness, picking 5 years of age as a minimum age is arbitrary.” For children with congenital SSD, or [those] that develop SSD early in life, “reducing the period of auditory deprivation is going to improve outcomes,” Dr. Young stressed.

Dr. Bush agreed. “The big gap within the FDA guideline is that it doesn’t address those children with congenital SSD, because if we’re implanting them at 5 years of age, many of their central neural pathways have reorganized to preclude optimal binaural hearing.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider, Pediatric, Practice Focus Tagged With: Clinical Guidelines, cochlear impantsIssue: August 2022

You Might Also Like:

  • Benefits of Cochlear Implants in Single-Sided Deafness Patients
  • Genetic Testing Is Appropriate for Some Pediatric Patients with Unilateral Hearing Loss or Single-Sided Deafness
  • How to Help Patients With Single-Sided Deafness Relearn Music
  • Psychosocial Aspects of Single-Sided Deafness Important to Consider in Patient Care

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • 22 Symptoms Common to Patients with Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939