• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Breaking Down the Positive and Negative Aspects of Direct-to-Consumer Advertising

by Karen Appold • December 12, 2022

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Innumerable patients have asked Dr. McCoul about balloon sinuplasty, which they learned about through advertisements on TV or radio. “Oftentimes, however, their medical problem isn’t one that balloon sinuplasty is designed to treat,” he said. “So, these patients start their visit with an expectation that can’t be reasonably met. This typically leads to a discussion about why a balloon treatment is inappropriate, which could be time better spent in other ways (Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. July 16, 2022. doi:10.1002/ alr.23063).”

You Might Also Like

  • COSM 2012: TRIO Guest of Honor Cautions against Physician Advertising
  • Report: Physician Prescribing Behavior Changes Following Restrictions on Direct Marketing
  • EMR and Advertising: Strange Bedfellows?
  • Juul Suspends U.S. Advertising, CEO Steps Down
Explore This Issue
December 2022

What the Studies Show

There are many misconceptions about DTCA, including the misconception that it’s tightly regulated. One study found that 43% of those surveyed thought that only “completely safe” prescription drugs could be marketed using DTCA, 21% thought that drugs had to be “extremely effective” to be advertised, and 22% thought that DTCA of drugs with serious side effects had already been banned (J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:651–657).

In another study, Dr. Applequist and her co-author found that broadcast DTCA placed a greater emphasis on emotional appeals over informational appeals (Ann Fam Med. 2018;16:211– 216). “Essentially, ads are selling more lifestyle and less education,” she said. “If, however, the point of these ads is to spur conversations with one’s physician, then their content should be predominantly informational. This means that DTCA should tell viewers about a drug’s effectiveness, the population it treats, its side effects, and so forth. It shouldn’t be focused on a use of vivid imagery, characters, or a catchy song.”

Information is in the ads, but it’s buried, Dr. Applequist noted. Her 2018 study showed that 57% of ads portrayed main characters seeking social approval, which is up more than 17% compared to a previous study from 2007 (Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:6–13). Dr. Applequist’s study also found that ads were 30% longer than those featured in earlier studies, with her findings revealing that the information included about drugs was significantly lessened.

A study from 2020 found that most patients didn’t see a negative effect from DTCA (J Am Board Fam Med. 2020;33:279–283). The study found that about 76% of patients were more likely to ask their physician about a drug that was directly advertised to them, one-quarter had already asked their physician about an advertised drug, and 23% of patients said they would look for another provider if their physician wouldn’t prescribe a brand name drug they asked for, said Dr. Luong.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: advertising, patient careIssue: December 2022

You Might Also Like:

  • COSM 2012: TRIO Guest of Honor Cautions against Physician Advertising
  • Report: Physician Prescribing Behavior Changes Following Restrictions on Direct Marketing
  • EMR and Advertising: Strange Bedfellows?
  • Juul Suspends U.S. Advertising, CEO Steps Down

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939