• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How To: Carolyn’s Window Approach to Unilateral Frontal Sinus Surgery

by Kachorn Seresirikachorn, MD, PhD, Andrea Sit, MD, Lu Hui Png, MD, Larry Kalish, MD, Raewyn G. Campbell, MD, Raquel Alvarado, PhD, and Richard J. Harvey, MD, PhD • April 25, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

INTRODUCTION

The traditional Draf 2a frontal sinus surgery is challenging due to the complexity and variations of the frontal recess and sinus anatomy (Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017;7:332–337). In particular, the thickness of the nasofrontal beak and anterior–posterior dimensions of the frontal recess make surgery challenging. These limitations affect the ease of Draf 2a surgery (Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017;7:332–337). Several prior techniques have been described to help manage this issue, including an axillary flap, removal of the anterior agger nasi (Laryngoscope. 2002;112:494–499) and an agger nasi punch-out procedure (Laryngoscope. 2006;116:1710–1712). The Carolyn’s window approach aims to remove the limitation created by the anterior–posterior depth to make a Draft 2a frontal sinusotomy easier for the surgeon. The approach is entirely a 0° endoscope technique and provides an excellent view of the frontal sinus and recess.

You Might Also Like

  • How To: Reconstruction of Anterior Table Frontal Sinus Defects with Pericranial Flap and Titanium Mesh
  • How To: Transseptal Approach to the Maxillary Sinus and Pterygopalatine Fossa
  • Does the Frontal Sinus Need To Be Obliterated Following Fracture with Frontal Sinus Outflow Tract Injury?
  • Frontal Sinus Drillout Viable for Frontal Sinus Disease
Explore This Issue
April 2023

The concept of an “axillectomy,” or removal of the axilla, includes removal of the entire frontal process of the maxilla and nasofrontal beak. This differs from axillotomy, or simply removing the front wall of the agger nasi. The utilization of high-speed powered instruments makes this technique rapid and efficient. The inferior-based lateral wall mucosal flap (modified-Woodworth flap) and free mucosal grafting of any exposed bone make for rapid mucosal healing. After the Carolyn’s window approach, the enlarged middle meatus provides enhanced frontal sinus access and irrigation (Laryngoscope. 2021;131:250–254). We describe the Carolyn’s window approach to frontal sinus surgery and the perioperative outcomes.

METHOD

Outcomes

The primary outcome was frontal sinus patency. Secondary outcomes were surgical morbidity, defined as early (<90 days) or late (>90 days). Early morbidity included bleeding (requiring intervention), pain (requiring additional analgesia), crusting (requiring an additional postop visit), adhesions (any), cerebrospinal fluid leak, periorbital edema or hematoma, and skin changes. Late morbidity included epiphora, smell reduction from baseline, retained frontal recess partitions, and any external cosmetic change.

Preparation

An endotracheal tube was positioned in the lower right commissure. The patient was prepared topically with 1% ropivacaine and 1:2,000 adrenaline-soaked cotton pledgets. Endoscopically, the mucosa was injected with 1% ropivacaine and 1:100,000 adrenaline across the lateral wall anterior to the middle turbinate and the root of the middle turbinate. The patient’s head was at an extended 30°–40°, and the patient was in a 15°–20° reverse Trendelenburg position, with total intravenous anesthesia and bradycardia.

Surgical Technique

A middle meatal antrostomy and at least an anterior ethmoidectomy are performed to identify the medial orbital wall. The approach is often combined with sphenoethmoidectomy or “neo-sinus” or “full-house” surgery. Carolyn’s window commences with the creation of the inferior-based lateral wall mucosal flap (modified-Woodworth flap). The incision on the lateral wall begins at the nasal cavity roof, high above the axilla, by needle-point diathermy, setting 12. The posterior incision, at a depth of the middle turbinate insertion, is carried vertically down to the middle turbinate. The superior incision is carried along the apex of the nasal cavity forward to the pyriform aperture and then vertically down, just behind the pyriform aperture, to a level that approximates the midpoint of the middle meatus. These incisions are to the bone, and the inferior-based lateral wall mucosal flap is elevated subperiosteally, with the flap retracted down and exposing the axilla and lateral wall bone.

Drilling proceeds with a 0° endoscope and a 4-mm 15° diamond burr, at 30,000 revolutions per minute, removing the entire axillaagger nasi-maxillary-frontal process complex. First, the periosteum of the frontal process of the maxilla bone and the nasolacrimal sac are identified as the lateral limits. These were discovered to widen the surgical field. Then, drilling proceeds to remove the entire axilla, lateral to the middle turbinate insertion, but medial to the periosteum that was just defined. Although the first olfactory neuron can be found to define the extent of medial dissection, as commonly performed in a Draf 3, this is generally not required, and the insertion of the middle turbinate serves as the medial landmark. The triangular bone anterior to the frontal recess is removed until the “blue lining” of the mucosa is seen, thus preserving the frontal recess itself. Drilling continues anteriorly and superiorly to remove the nasofrontal beak in a vertical orientation relative to the apex of the frontal sinus. Once the remaining bone is thin, the frontal recess partitions are removed with the 2.5-mm 45° cutting forceps and 4.3-mm quadcut straight microdebrider. The 5-mm 70° Hosemann frontal sinus punch can complete the removal of bone edges but is used with a 0° endoscope. At the end, a giant middle meatus is created with all frontal sinus walls that can be seen through the 0° endoscope.

The inferior-based lateral wall mucosal flap is returned to cover the lateral wall. A free mucosal graft from the inferior turbinate tail is thinned and covers any exposed bone (Figure 1). The middle meatus is stented with hyaluronic acid gel and a Merocel finger glove spacer with no other packing.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: How I Do It, Practice Focus, Rhinology Tagged With: patient care, sinus surgeryIssue: April 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • How To: Reconstruction of Anterior Table Frontal Sinus Defects with Pericranial Flap and Titanium Mesh
  • How To: Transseptal Approach to the Maxillary Sinus and Pterygopalatine Fossa
  • Does the Frontal Sinus Need To Be Obliterated Following Fracture with Frontal Sinus Outflow Tract Injury?
  • Frontal Sinus Drillout Viable for Frontal Sinus Disease

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939