• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Chronic Rhinosinusitis Symptom Duration Does Not Affect ESS Outcomes

by Literature Review • February 6, 2019

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Do patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with longer symptom duration have worse preoperative disease severity and/or quality of life (QOL), and does delayed surgical intervention influence outcomes of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS)?

Bottom Line
Symptom duration was not associated with mean preoperative disease severity or QOL. Patients with long-term symptom duration reported the greatest mean postoperative QOL improvement, suggesting that delayed surgical intervention may not reduce QOL improvement following ESS.

You Might Also Like

  • ESS Provides Better QOL for CRS Patients with Comorbid Migraine
  • QOL Comparison Between Surgeons Following ESS Possible
  • ESS Improves CRS-Related Subjective Olfactory Dysfunction
  • Snot-22 Scores Can Help Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis Considering Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
Explore This Issue
February 2019

Background: Current consensus guidelines recommend ESS as a treatment option for CRS patients who have persistent symptomatic burden and objective evidence of disease despite receiving appropriate medical management. Patients with worse sinus-specific QOL impairment are more likely to pursue ESS, while those with less symptomatic burden are more likely to continue medical therapy alone. The choice to delay ESS has never been considered inherently harmful, but recent studies have questioned whether the duration of persistent, symptomatic CRS impacts long-term outcomes.

Study design: Multicenter cohort study of 113 CRS patients observed over an average of 14.7 months between July 2012 and January 2016 following primary ESS.

Setting: Departments/Divisions of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery at the following: Oregon Health and Science University, Portland; University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston; Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.; University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Synopsis: The final study cohort was re-categorized into symptom duration subgroups: short-term (32 at <12 months), middle-term (39 at 12–60 months), and long-term (42 at  >60 months). Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT) scores were significantly worse in the long-term cohort compared to the middle-term cohort. There were no significant differences between participants with and without postoperative follow-up across demographic, comorbidity, and disease severity clinical measures, or across mean patient-reported outcome measure scores, with the exception of age at enrollment: Participants providing postoperative follow-up were significantly older on average. Within-subject mean improvements were highly significant for all three cohorts for all patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) over time, except for the SNOT-22 rhinologic, extranasal rhinologic, and sleep domains, and the Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) emotional domain. Long-term cohort patients reported significantly greater improvement across disease-specific PROMs and improved on SNOT-22 psychological dysfunction scores compared to the short-term cohort; improved significantly more on SNOT-22 ear/facial scores compared to the middle-term cohort; and improved significantly more on SNOT-22 total scores compared to both. Limitations included a potential bias toward more severe sinonasal disease at academic tertiary care centers; a potential for differential misclassification and/or recall bias; unmeasured confounding factors that may be responsible for observed associations; and sample size limitations.

Citation: Alt JA, Orlandi RR, Mace JC, Soler ZM, Smith TL. Does delaying endoscopic sinus surgery adversely impact quality-of-life outcomes? Laryngoscope. 2019;129:303–311.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Rhinology Tagged With: chronic rhinosinusitis, endoscopic sinus surgery, ESS, quality of lifeIssue: February 2019

You Might Also Like:

  • ESS Provides Better QOL for CRS Patients with Comorbid Migraine
  • QOL Comparison Between Surgeons Following ESS Possible
  • ESS Improves CRS-Related Subjective Olfactory Dysfunction
  • Snot-22 Scores Can Help Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis Considering Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939