• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

CROS and Baha-Which Type of Hearing Assistance Is Better?

by Heather Lindsey • January 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Contralateral routing of signals (CROS) hearing aids and the bone-anchored cochlear stimulator, or the Baha® system (Cochlear Americas, Centennial, CO), are standard treatments for unilateral hearing loss. Although each device has its advantages and disadvantages, Baha appears to be the preferred option due to better hearing quality and patient comfort, according to the physicians interviewed for this article.

You Might Also Like

  • Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids Offer Viable Alternative to Standard Devices
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
  • Atresiaplasty versus Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid for Congenital Aural Atresia
  • SM14: Treatment for Thyroid Tumors and Benefits of Hearing Devices Spark Debate Among Otolaryngologists
Explore This Issue
January 2009

CROS Indications and Contraindications

Traditional CROS consists of a microphone worn in the hearing-impaired ear and a receiver worn in the hearing ear. Sounds are then transmitted from the microphone to the hearing ear via a wire or wireless system.

CROS is indicated when a patient has one ear that-owing to high thresholds or poor speech discrimination-is not amenable to direct or air-conducting amplification, but whose opposite ear is still capable of hearing, said John K. Niparko, MD, George T. Nager Professor in the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

John K. Niparko, MDOne of the things that I find astounding is that close to 50,000 Bahas are in use worldwide, and just three years ago the number was under 10,000.

-John K. Niparko, MD

Contraindications for CROS include bad hearing in both ears and not being able to accommodate the microphone because of a closed ear canal or infection, said Darius Kohan, MD, Clinical Associate Professor in the Department of Otolaryngology at New York University School of Medicine. CROS is also difficult to use in patients who may have eczema in their ear canals, because the space around the microphone and receiver need to be clean.

A newer form of CROS, a transcranial system called TransEar® (TransEar, Johnson City, TN) consists of a small behind-the-ear digital hearing aid, which is joined by a thin flexible connector wire to a miniature oscillator that fits deeply and snuggly into the ear canal, according to manufacturer’s Web site (www.transear.com ).

The device sends sound vibration through the bony portion of the ear canal, through the bones of the skull to the inner ear or cochlea on the opposite side, explained Dr. Kohan.

One advantage of the transcranial CROS over the traditional CROS is that the patient does not need to wear a receiver in the good ear, said Jack Wazen, MD, of the Florida Ear and Sinus Center in Sarasota.

Baha Indications and Contraindications

The Baha consists of a sound processor attached to an external abutment, held in place by a titanium screw, which is surgically implanted into the skull behind the ear. The bone carries vibrations that bypass the external and middle ear and travel directly to the cochlear nerve.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Otology/Neurotology, Tech Talk Issue: January 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids Offer Viable Alternative to Standard Devices
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
  • Atresiaplasty versus Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid for Congenital Aural Atresia
  • SM14: Treatment for Thyroid Tumors and Benefits of Hearing Devices Spark Debate Among Otolaryngologists

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939