• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Defect Size, Depth, Patient Factors Affect Scalp Reconstruction Choice

by Amy E. Hamaker • March 9, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What are the factors that influence the choice of technique and complications of scalp reconstruction after oncologic ablation?

Background: Scalp defects can be produced through a number of conditions and treatments. Scalp reconstruction following oncologic resection presents a particularly difficult situation for both patient and surgeon given the urgency of ablation and uncertainty in final defect size. There are currently few objective data on reconstructive outcomes and what factors may play a role in complications and reconstructive failures.

You Might Also Like

  • Free Flap Surgery Viable Choice for Mandible Reconstruction
  • How To: Hidden Port Approach to Endoscopic Pericranial Scalp Flap for Anterior Skull Base Reconstruction
  • Patient Age Correlates with Medical, Not Surgical, Complications Following Free Flap Reconstruction
  • Factors to Consider When Treating Pediatric Airway Reconstruction
Explore This Issue
March 2015

Study design: Single-institution retrospective review of 139 patients who required oncologic scalp resection with subsequent reconstruction between 1992 and 2010.

Setting: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

Synopsis: The majority of the patients were males aged 60 to 70. Thirty-five had undergone a previous resection and presented for completion resection, 18 had undergone Mohs’ micrographic surgery and were referred for reconstruction of a complex defect, and the remainder had primary wide local excision and reconstruction in a single stage. Approximately two-thirds of the defects were reconstructed using simple techniques; the remainder required more advanced reconstruction. Fifteen complications total were identified: three major and 12 minor. Scalp defect depth was correlated with and size was significantly associated with increased complication rate. Reconstruction type did not significantly affect complication rates. Patients with a history of pre-operative head and neck radiation exposure had a significantly higher complication rate. Other factors affecting wound healing were not significantly associated with increased complication rates, but the data on whether diabetes mellitus or hypothyroidism were under good control were inconsistent.

Bottom line: Larger and deeper defects, and factors including pre-operative radiation and immunosuppression, are more prone to wound complications.

Citation: Janus JR, Peck BW, Tombers NM, Price DL, Moore EJ. Complications after oncologic scalp reconstruction: A 139-patient series and treatment algorithm. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:582-588.

Filed Under: Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Head and Neck, Literature Reviews Tagged With: onocologic ablation, scalp reconstructionIssue: March 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • Free Flap Surgery Viable Choice for Mandible Reconstruction
  • How To: Hidden Port Approach to Endoscopic Pericranial Scalp Flap for Anterior Skull Base Reconstruction
  • Patient Age Correlates with Medical, Not Surgical, Complications Following Free Flap Reconstruction
  • Factors to Consider When Treating Pediatric Airway Reconstruction

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939