• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Endoscopic Approach to Sinonasal Malignancies Stirs Debate

by Heather Lindsey • May 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The Controversy

Most of the limited experience with endoscopic treatment of malignancies centers on lower-grade lesions, principally esthesioneuroblastomas at the Kadish A/B stage, said Dr. Osguthorpe. Very little information exists, aside from what is technically feasible, on longer-term control of endoscopically resected higher-grade lesions, and as with any topic where there’s inconclusive information yet major interest, it’s controversial, he said.

You Might Also Like

  • SM13: Endoscopic Techniques Evolve As New Treatment for Sinonasal Malignancies
  • What Is the Best Timing for Endoscopic and Radiographic Surveillance Following Sinonasal Malignancies Treatment?
  • Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery Indications Continue to Expand
  • Endoscopic Resection of Esthesioneuroblastomas Shows Promising Results
Explore This Issue
May 2009
Figure. Endoscopic view of the healed sinonasal cavity four years after resection of sinonasal carcinoma in a 70-year-old patient.

click for large version
Figure. Endoscopic view of the healed sinonasal cavity four years after resection of sinonasal carcinoma in a 70-year-old patient.

During the 1980s, the optimal treatment of esthesioneuroblastoma was a source of debate not among surgeons, but between surgeons and radiation oncologists, because the tumor is relatively sensitive to radiation. Today, most physicians favor surgery for esthesioneuroblastomas, with or without radiation, depending on tumor stage, said Dr. Osguthorpe. If a tumor is early-stage, confined to the nasal cavity, or with modest adjacent sinus involvement, a transnasal endoscopic approach supplemented by external beam radiation to the anterior fossa floor, primarily the olfactory bulb region, may be appropriate, he said (citing Unger et al. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2001;44: 79-84).

Radiation is expected to control minor disease spread through the cribriform plate, a finding Dr. Osguthorpe encountered in a patient who presented with a 2-cm solely intranasal esthesioneuroblastoma on MRI, yet had microscopic disease in the ipsilateral olfactory bulb.

Alternatively, the surgeon can resect the olfactory region via an endoscopy alone, but challenges associated with defect closure and maintaining the safety of adjacent intracranial structures may arise, said Dr. Osguthorpe, adding that few physicians currently have the expertise to use this approach. For larger tumors with obvious skull base or anterior fossa involvement, a formal craniotomy, endoscopically assisted on the transnasal portion of the procedure, may be prudent, and is usually combined with postoperative irradiation, he said.

Generally, radiation needs to be employed after both endoscopic resection and open craniofacial surgery, said Dr. Kraus. However, the goal of either procedure is to completely resect the entire tumor, he added.

Overall, an endorsement of endoscopic resection of aggressive or advanced malignancies should be withheld until long-term data are available to support its use, said Dr. Osguthorpe, noting that this view was also expressed by Paul Levine, MD, at the Ogura Lecture given at the at the Triological Society 111th Annual Meeting in Orlando, FL, last spring (Laryngoscope 2009;119:3-7; ENT Today 2008(7); 3:8-9).

Moreover, endoscopic treatment of these tumors should occur only in a clinical trial setting with long-term follow-up, so physicians can learn from the experience, added Dr. Osguthorpe.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Rhinology, Tech Talk Issue: May 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • SM13: Endoscopic Techniques Evolve As New Treatment for Sinonasal Malignancies
  • What Is the Best Timing for Endoscopic and Radiographic Surveillance Following Sinonasal Malignancies Treatment?
  • Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery Indications Continue to Expand
  • Endoscopic Resection of Esthesioneuroblastomas Shows Promising Results

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939