• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Endoscopic Resection of Esthesioneuroblastomas Shows Promising Results

by Ed Susman • October 1, 2008

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

He advised colleagues that there may be limits to what can be achieved with endoscopic dissection of esthesioneuroblastomas and other malignancies, including whether the entire tumor can be removed using endoscopic approaches. Another limit is the individual doctor’s comfort level in dealing with complications, neural injury, and reconstruction.

You Might Also Like

  • Endoscopic versus Open Craniofacial Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma: What Is the Evidence?
  • More Experience Needed for Endoscopic Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma
  • Do Open and Endoscopic Resection Approaches to Juvenile Nasopharyngea Angiofibroma Result in Similar Blood Loss, Recurrence Rates?
  • Innovative Doctors + Better Technology = Practice Changess
Explore This Issue
October 2008

Dr. Snyderman said that duration of surgery might also be a limiting factor, as some of the operations can be lengthy. They certainly can take a toll on the surgeon, he said.

He demonstrated in his talk that one of the main concepts of endoscopic endonasal surgery involves access of the endonasal corridor. This provides you with direct access to tumors, he said. There is no easy way to get there except through the nose. It gets you right to the base of the tumor. The goal is avoiding displacement of neurovascular structures. This becomes no-retraction, no-touch brain surgery.

I think that this is really the only true form of team surgery. You have two disciplines working together simultaneously, and neither one alone can achieve the goals of the surgery. There are lots of benefits from working together. It has been a tremendous advantage.

Endoscopic Techniques

Dr. Snyderman said that when surgeons use an endoscopic approach, there is no difference in dissection goals as compared with conventional surgery. We use both nostrils so that we can operate with both hands. We often start by debulking the tumor and collapsing the tumor onto itself, and that gives us access to the margins of the tumor. We then perform an extracapsular dissection. There is no pulling of tumors. We are not just pulling tumors out through the nose. There is very gentle retraction, he said.

The majority of the time we will use a two-suction dissection technique. One suction provides very gentle retraction. It is not enough traction to tear vessels on the back side of the tumor, and the other suction is a dissector, he explained.

In removal of esthesioneuroblastomas, Dr. Snyderman said, we start by debulking the portion of the tumor that is hanging in the nasal cavity. We identify the landmarks around the margins of the tumor. We find the margins in the front sinus anteriorly, the nasal septum inferiorly, and the orbit laterally.

Then we start removing the bone around the margins of the tumor to expose the dura. The dura is incised at the margins of the skull base, and finally there is complete resection of the dura, the olfactory bulb, and the olfactory tract. There is no retraction of the frontal lobes, but we are still achieving the same resection and we are having excellent visualization. There is nothing blind about this technique.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, endoscopic surgery, head and neck, outcomes, surgery, techniques, treatment, tumorIssue: October 2008

You Might Also Like:

  • Endoscopic versus Open Craniofacial Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma: What Is the Evidence?
  • More Experience Needed for Endoscopic Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma
  • Do Open and Endoscopic Resection Approaches to Juvenile Nasopharyngea Angiofibroma Result in Similar Blood Loss, Recurrence Rates?
  • Innovative Doctors + Better Technology = Practice Changess

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939